Stats

Comments Posted By Will T

Displaying 0 To 0 Of 0 Comments

THE TRUE FACE OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY

Do you know you are being a reactionary as well?

Hypocrite.

» Posted By Will T On November 6, 2009 @ 5:15 am

You aren’t really concerned about the issues. You are more interested with being offensive and insulting towards republicans and conservatives.

And you call righties reactionary.

Hypocrite.

» Posted By Will T On November 6, 2009 @ 5:05 am

How it is that the Teabagger Movement is bogus

Great start to it.

I am still laughing at your initial words to me where you tried to claim that you were all for the debate and you wanted to leave the petty insults and attacks out.

Enjoy your republican hate fest orgy.

» Posted By Will T On November 6, 2009 @ 5:11 am

So much for taking the insults out so real debate can happen.

Enjoy rolling around in the mud with the rest of the pigs.

» Posted By Will T On November 6, 2009 @ 5:03 am

Twelve Shot Dead and Thirty One Wounded at Fort Hood.

This is what I am talking about. Who gives a shit about the right wing response when it comes to this?

This was a serious incident and all you want to do is drag up lefty/righty bullshit.

» Posted By Will T On November 6, 2009 @ 5:17 am

Is this the definition of cognitive dissonance?

So did too much government influence.

» Posted By Will T On November 5, 2009 @ 4:02 pm

I wasn’t talking about the government.

» Posted By Will T On November 5, 2009 @ 4:01 pm

No, I am for limited government involvement and dependency.

As limited as possible.

» Posted By Will T On November 5, 2009 @ 3:16 pm

No, I don’t think I can change any of you nor would I try.

» Posted By Will T On November 5, 2009 @ 3:14 pm

We aren’t the government.

535 people in Washington are the government. You just get your say in who gets to play every so often.

If you were the government then the HC reforms you want passed would already be done.

» Posted By Will T On November 5, 2009 @ 3:12 pm

Thank you for making my point. Exactly, the government is there to act as a referee not to get in the game.

If a corp gets to big then the government has to break it up to prevent a monopoly. Remember the bell?

Who is going to break up the government?

» Posted By Will T On November 5, 2009 @ 3:05 pm

Really? Somehow you came to the conclusion that I am an anarchist?

I thought it was about the debate and not the person? Didn’t you say that?

Anyway, it is the idea of limited government not no government.

» Posted By Will T On November 5, 2009 @ 3:02 pm

Once you build it up you have to tear it down.

But that isn’t the argument.

Limited government is.

» Posted By Will T On November 5, 2009 @ 3:00 pm

I asked for simple link that supports the accusation so that I can read up on it.

Hell, you are missing the opportunity to convince somebody to believe what you are saying yet you pass it up.

If it is common knowledge then there must be plenty of reputable links that talk discuss this.

» Posted By Will T On November 5, 2009 @ 2:55 pm

The roads and zoning argument again. You should have brought up the cops and the fire department instead. Much better use of government services.

Somebody remind me how those are comparable to health care? How they make up 1/6th of our economy?

» Posted By Will T On November 5, 2009 @ 2:51 pm

Sure. So you have to wait 4 or 6 or however many years and even then it may not return to your favor.

How is that any different then what is going on now?

The problem with depending on the government is you are now putting the control of resources into the hands of a small few whereas with having corporations that control is spread across a larger group. Not one corporation can dominate another.

What competing power is going to keep the government in check?

» Posted By Will T On November 5, 2009 @ 2:36 pm

And so are the politicians. They are in it for the money and the power.

Remember this, when you get screwed by a corporation you have the power of the government to help you get it resolved. When you get screwed by the government you have no help.

» Posted By Will T On November 5, 2009 @ 2:21 pm

It is about the debate around here.

» Posted By Will T On November 5, 2009 @ 2:10 pm

As is your argument.

» Posted By Will T On November 5, 2009 @ 12:47 pm

But you are acknowledging the fact that you use the term with the intent to insult.

That is my point. You can’t debate open and civilly if your intent is to insult someone.

» Posted By Will T On November 5, 2009 @ 12:42 pm

So you don’t have anything that shows that?

» Posted By Will T On November 5, 2009 @ 12:40 pm

Did your opinion on the usage of the word change once you found out people were offended by it?

» Posted By Will T On November 5, 2009 @ 12:34 pm

With no basis.

Both sides to hateful things and no side does it anymore or any worse than the other.

» Posted By Will T On November 5, 2009 @ 12:33 pm

And they are but that doesn’t make them classy. Just like this holocaust pic.

» Posted By Will T On November 5, 2009 @ 12:32 pm

Your opinion.

» Posted By Will T On November 5, 2009 @ 12:22 pm

You have shown me “an” instance.

I have shown you “an” instance where people are offended by the use of the word.

Did that change your opinion?

» Posted By Will T On November 5, 2009 @ 12:20 pm

Of course. This does nothing for the debate.

There is no reason to try and equate what is happening with HC reform to the holocaust.

But there is freedom of expression.

» Posted By Will T On November 5, 2009 @ 12:19 pm

And I agree with you. The reason I link this is because it happens on both sides.

» Posted By Will T On November 5, 2009 @ 12:18 pm

And then there is all of this.

http://zombietime.com/hall_of_shame/

What are people thinking?

» Posted By Will T On November 5, 2009 @ 12:14 pm

Regardless of the use your putting forth that “teabaggers” is an acceptable term to use because somebody used it a song.

» Posted By Will T On November 5, 2009 @ 12:12 pm

«« Back To Stats Page