Pelosi: ‘No choice’ but to move forward with articles of impeachment

“Censure” is a condemnation by an official body that results because they believe that a public official has acted immorally. That particular word is used because the act goes beyond mere transgressions of law, and violates our most fundamental beliefs, as are expressed in the “Ten Commandments,” and the “Preamble to the Constitution.”

Looks like President Trump will be impeached, and smart money says, before Christmas – accompanied by very strong censure (which could include taking away, or closely monitoring, many of Trump’s responsibilities).

It is very possible to restrain and restrict Donald Trump. There’s already a strong federal law requiring that acts of Presidential power be reviewed and authorized within six months of implementation. They may be reviewed, and terminated instantly, at any time. Likewise, it is illegal to violate the rights to due process that are guaranteed to asylum seekers. No wall; no concentration camps at the Border. Just like that!

But, there’s an unwritten rule that says that you can’t impeach with removal in the last six months of office. So, accounting for the holidays, there’s only about 3-1/2 months for a Senate trial with all its particular, and unwavering requirements. That’s not realistic. But, it can simply be dispensed with.

The House of Representatives is the “Voice of the People,” and the people will have spoken. Trump won’t be able to blow anything up. Pence won’t be President. Trump will be voted out.

But, I’m left searching for a candidate who understands what an honor it would be to be President. I’m running out of time on that one too.

Previous articleTrump Is The Problem! Could He Also Be The Solution?
Next articlePapers Filed, North Carolina Has First-In-History Openly-Trans Candidate For State Legislature
Air Force brat. My dad was shepherd to a bunch of B-52's; the GI's called that place "20 Minutes From Armageddon;" because a missile launched in East Germany would pop over our heads twenty minutes later. That put me in some of the best schools anywhere. I wrote in the Press Office of a powerful, charismatic Midwestern Governor. I dabble in graphic arts. My 50+ entertainment sites get a few million visits, and I have stopped counting the fans, likes, and shares, per year. I've rambled the world, hitched around the continent (counter-clockwise). Climbed a couple of teeners, been to a couple of thousand rock, blues, and jazz concerts. I was at a free concert on Telegraph Avenue, Berkeley, CA with about 350,000 freaks and hippies; and other festivals. I won a writing contest when I was six. It was a Poe-like horror story taken from an account of a mining disaster. I had already been reading Edgar Allan Poe (which may explain a lot). I could read before I could talk. I implemented some of the first client/server, TCP-IP networks (the Internet) at many of the world's largest corporations. I know a half-dozen programming languages, and have implemented and administered many network operating systems. Right now I build ebikes, and lithium batteries from scratch. I was taught that race and ethnicity don't set us apart. I think that the best thing that could happen in this country would be if a woman were to be elected President of the United States. I admire President Obama more than any man in history, save one.

Leave a Comment

Please Login to comment
1 Comment threads
3 Thread replies
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
3 Comment authors
AdLibSteppenwolfMurphTheSurf3 Recent comment authors
newest oldest most voted
Notify of

My understanding is that censure is nothing more than a strong reprimand. Nevertheless it is very rarely used. The House has never censured a President. The Senate censured one, Andrew Jackson. I don’t think there are any limitations placed on the authority or the actions of anyone censured. I have looked for references to the limitations that you lay out. Have you something you can point me to?


Unfortunately, the symbolism of censure would be lost on Trump and the GOP, they would likely look at it as meaningless and a defeat for Democrats.

This is more of an all or nothing situation, either Democrats believe that Trump has committed High Crimes and Misdemeanors, which requires impeachment, or they are unsure and thus shouldn’t be drawing up and voting on Articles of Impeachment.

The point in this impeachment needs to be Democrats conviction that Trump should be convicted and removed. Weakening or diluting that would only serve Trump and undercut themselves.