On four occasions last year unions gathered in the Indiana State Capitol to protest actions beings considered by the GOP dominated State Assembly. In all four cases, the bills were either defeated or postponed.

Indiana officials delivered an end-of-year surprise to state residents on Friday, announcing a limit on the number of people who can be inside the statehouse at any one time. The bill was introduced under expedited rules which pertain to administrative procedures. As a result, there were no public hearings. Democratic and labor leaders swiftly condemned the move as an attempt to quash dissent and reduce the size of public protests.

Effective Jan. 1, only 3,000 people will be allowed inside the building at one time which includes the 1,700 state employees who work there. This means that just over 1,000 others will be able to assemble on a given day.

The rule was drafted by the Indiana State Police, the state’s homeland security department and the state fire marshal’s office. Gov. Mitch Daniels (R) appointed the heads of all those offices.

The action is clearly in response to union action. Last February, for example, thousands of union supporters gathered at the statehouse to protest the GOP-controlled legislature’s push to pass “right to work” legislation, that would have barred companies and employees from negotiating contracts that required all employees to pay representation dues.

With vocal union support, thirty-nine Democratic lawmakers walked out to protest the bill, eventually staying away from the state for five weeks. Daniels was forced to persuade the legislature to postpone the bill.

Even though it’s pretty clear why the restrictive bill is in place, State Police Superintendent Paul Whitesell, tells a different story. He told the Indianapolis Star that the capacity limit was being implemented strictly for safety reasons.

“During the last legislative session, several scheduled events were interrupted or canceled, and we want everyone who visits or schedules an event in the building to have a pleasant and successful experience,” he said.

That trumps the Constituti­on Any Day, right? No?

Let’s consider the 1st Amendment.

“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishm­ent of religion, or prohibitin­g the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances­.”

Now let’s consider Article VI, Clause 2 of the United States Constituti­on, known as the Supremacy Clause, establishe­s the U.S. Constituti­on, U.S. Treaties, and Federal Statutes as “the supreme law of the land.”

“This Constituti­on, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the constituti­on or laws of any state to the contrary notwithsta­nding.”

Pretty cut and dried. The Indiana Law is Unconstitu­tional….­..It will take time and money to oppose it effectively. Given precedence, the law should be easily struck down. Now if we only had a Supreme Court willing to back us up on that….

The GOP (with the assistance of ALEC- The American Legislative Exchange Council) has crafted a series of actions aimed at sidetracking constitutional protections wherever possible. Block the Vote, Derail the Unions, Limit the Right to Assemble.

The (oh-so-serious) games continue.

HAPPY NEW ELECTION YEAR.
The Year We Better Take the Battle to Them.

13
Leave a Comment

Please Login to comment
3 Comment threads
10 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
7 Comment authors
KhiradCaruMurphTheSurf3SueInCaAdLib Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
SueInCa
Member

Murph
What are they going to do in the instance of the State of the State address? Is there not usually more than that in attendence?

Report this comment

Khirad
Member
choicelady
Member

Artist- Any decent judges left in Indiana who will honor the Constitution and NOT the GOP opposition to, well, people?

Y’know – I’d think this is someplace the Baggers should join forces with anyone else. They crowded into the CA capitol and might even find reason to do it in Indiana. They’d be prohibited, too – if the powers that would be did not turn a blind eye, of course.

Why are so many Americans willing to give up their freedoms? The pissing and moaning is all about “property” (which is not guaranteed or protected save for the 4th, 5th, and some 14th amendment protections IF you have property) but nothing about civil liberties. And yet the Right fears the Black Helicopters from the feds all the while the goblins in the states are the ones picking off their rights.

There are a lot of rights over and above the Second Amendment which is NOT even under threat. Wow – some people sure do fool easily.

Report this comment

Artist50
Member
Artist50

I’m not sure there are CL. We just go further to the right. We passed a very restrictive abortion bill in 2011 and Daniels eight years are up so he doesn’t care, although he has openly said he’d like to be a VP choice and this is going to bring in some bad PR. But, what I think is bad PR may be good PR to the Right. Sadly, Mike Pence wants his job and he’s twice as conservative and we don’t really have anyone strong to run against him. It’s amazing we went with Obama in 2008, perhaps those people don’t vote in local elections. It makes me crazy!!!!

Report this comment

AdLib
Admin

As disappointing as the rightward swerve is in IN, I do agree with CL that ultimately, this will be stayed then struck down as unconstitutional.

This is a violation of federal rights so it’s not up to state judges or state supreme courts to have the final say, even if they want to put their politics ahead of the Constitution.

Walker in WI has tried the same tactic and it’s only a matter of time until it is challenged de facto by a protest then struck down in court (federal if necessary).

What is with the rank and file Republicans who just look the other way as THEIR rights are taken away from them too by their leaders, just because they want their team to “win” by any means necessary?

Winning is everything to these fools, even if they have to lose everything they have so “their” party wins. Frankly, being a Republican seems to require a degree of self-destructive mental illness.

And their ignorance is astonishing, not even being capable of the thought, “What if Dems ever take back the Governor and Legislature and WE want to protest to stop them?”

Destroying the town to save it, the GOP motto since 1980.

Report this comment

Artist50
Member
Artist50

Having been in this huge stone building many times, this ruling is poppycock! A typical small town high school basketball game will seat three thousand. My own hometown of New Castle has a world class facility that will seat over half the town, almost 10,000. And they don’t seem to be worried about those fire codes. This is strictly political and beneath Daniels because they’re getting ready to vote for the “Right to Work” law. There’s plenty of room outside for protesters, but I wouldn’t think Mitch would want the NCAA crowd to see them!

Report this comment