house3

UPDATE #3 HOUSE HEALTHCARE REFORM PASSES HOUSE 220-215 IN HISTORIC VOTE!

UPDATE #2 Anti-choice amendment passes 240-194 and Republic alternate “healthcare plan” rejected resoundingly 176-258.

UPDATE #1 based on whip counts by Democratic aids Politico reports the Dems have the votes to pass the Healthcare bill in congress. If anyone has any info on the anti-choice amendment please keep us updated.

Make no mistake the vote that may happen today on the healthcare bill is the biggest decision by Congress in our generation. The House healthcare reform bill is not perfect but it’s a quantum leap forward towards providing everyone healthcare in this country that they can afford. The House bill is particularly generous with subsidizing and minimizing premiums compared to the Senate bill. One of the best parts of the House bill is that it actually limits the amount of overhead and profits a private healthcare insurance company can have to 15% which is very under reported. The Wonk Room from Think Progress reports that the House bill will cover more than the Senate bill and cost people less in premiums. Following is a graph illustrating the difference in premium costs.

ChartAfford

In comparison we all know the Republican bill is a complete piece of gobshite. Ezra Klein reported that the CBO actually estimates that the Republican bill will save less and cover far fewer uninsured Americans.

“Late last night, the Congressional Budget Office released its initial analysis of the health-care reform plan that Republican Minority Leader John Boehner offered as a substitute to the Democratic legislation. CBO begins with the baseline estimate that 17 percent of legal, non-elderly residents won’t have health-care insurance in 2010. In 2019, after 10 years of the Republican plan, CBO estimates that …17 percent of legal, non-elderly residents won’t have health-care insurance. The Republican alternative will have helped 3 million people secure coverage, which is barely keeping up with population growth. Compare that to the Democratic bill, which covers 36 million more people and cuts the uninsured population to 4 percent.

But maybe, you say, the Republican bill does a really good job cutting costs. According to CBO, the GOP’s alternative will shave $68 billion off the deficit in the next 10 years. The Democrats, CBO says, will slice $104 billion off the deficit.

The Democratic bill, in other words, covers 12 times as many people and saves $36 billion more than the Republican plan. And amazingly, the Democratic bill has already been through three committees and a merger process. It’s already been shown to interest groups and advocacy organizations and industry stakeholders. It’s already made its compromises with reality. It’s already been through the legislative sausage grinder. And yet it saves more money and covers more people than the blank-slate alternative proposed by John Boehner and the House Republicans. The Democrats, constrained by reality, produced a far better plan than Boehner, who was constrained solely by his political imagination and legislative skill.”

Again elections and votes are about choosing the best alternative.  The Democratic bills are far better than the Republican bill and the House bill is better than the Senate bill.  When I hear some purists progressives saying  just start over because the House bill is not enough they are echoing the same arguments Republicans are making.  The house bill is a big step towards progress, even though it’s not the step most of us want to take it’s still worth supporting.

To keep an eye on the debate tune into CSPAN.  I will update the article if a vote does occur.

309
Leave a Comment

Please Login to comment
52 Comment threads
257 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
24 Comment authors
janchupAuntieChristnicole473HITOTheLateGrardini Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
bito
Member

Wow! Is that BC/BS ?

Report this comment

bito
Member

oops, that was a question for javaz

Report this comment

javaz
Member

My husband and I just received quite the shock in the mail.
We were prepared for our monthly health insurance to rise, but not by 35%!
Half of my husband’s pension now goes to health insurance.
We’re too young for Medicare and we both realize that we are lucky to have insurance, but at the rate of increases, I’m not sure how much longer we can afford it.
I guess if worse comes to worse, we’ll just pare down more and do what we must.

Report this comment

janchup
Member
janchup

Do we live in a Constitutional Republic any longer?
The 16th Amendment made lawful the income tax – that is, a direct tax on Americans.
But nowhere in The Constitution is the power found to force people, under penalty of law (including fines and imprisonment), to pay private parties for services they do not desire to purchase.
Yet that is in the bill passed last night.
Yes, we have Congressfolk – both men and women, and all Democrats (save one Republican) who voted for this.
This sure appears to be blatantly unconstitutional – and, I would argue, those who voted for the bill know it. But they don’t care, they are good soldiers.

Report this comment

Corgi Lover
Guest

I don’t like the concept either, especially in an uncontrolled marketplace where the purchasers will get reamed, but there are a number of constitutional scholars who will disagree with your lay assessment of it’s constitutionality.

Report this comment

Corgi Lover
Guest

Big Good Evening to deygirl.

And to Javaz, and HITO of course.

Plus eeryone else out there tonight!

Report this comment

HITO
Member
HITO

Back at you FM.

Report this comment

javaz
Member

Found a really interesting blog about women’s rights and equality.
I’ve never thought about the things mentioned in this diary, but I agree with them, and wonder what you think.
To sum it up, in case you don’t have the time to read it.

– Republicans and some Democrats want to deny women the right to contraception. Already it is permissible for pharmacists to deny women contraceptives or RU486 on religious grounds.
-Why don’t the same rules apply to men when it comes to Viagra?
-Why shouldn’t men be forced to wait 24 hours once seeking Viagra, and be counseled by the doctor about the repercussions of Viagra by showing a film of a woman giving birth?
-Why don’t pharmacists demand proof, such as a marriage certificate and the approval of the man’s wife, of the man seeking Viagra?
-Why aren’t men counseled on using condoms when receiving Viagra, not only to prevent pregnancy, but spreading STDs?

It is a very interesting diary and explains that the fight in the health care bill isn’t about abortion, but about women being considered equal as men, including autonomy of our bodies.

http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2009/11/8/802199/-Im-Done-Talking-About-Abortion

Report this comment

HITO
Member
HITO

Good evening Javaz.

I have a 17 year old daughter and I remind her sporadically of the history behind a woman’s right to reproductive choice. I also tell her it will be her job in the future to protect it.

The GOP have had their eye on Roe V Wade forever. Conservative christian types just bash away at any woman expressing a desire to control her body. Ridiculous…so 19th century. Another reason most of Europe laughs at us.

Is it “woman, get back in that kitchen, be barefoot and submit”? God help them. No way. We will never allow things to go back to the abortion alleys my grandmother knew about. Never.

When it comes to health insurance coverage, the two facedness between a woman’s right to birth control, and a man’s sexual enhancement meds is a real eye opener.

As I have previously mentioned here, my local Obama-ians are going to down to DC on the 19th to meet with Senator Gillibrand. Their info email includes a statement that they will be addressing specific women issues exclusively for the 15 minutes they’ve been scheduled to meet.

Hope Gillibrand listens.

Report this comment

deygirl
Member

Gotta love that ins. won’t cover birth control, tries not to cover pregnancy and childbirth, and is now denying coverage to the babies once born.

BUT—no problem getting drugs to make the flaccid, mighty.

Raped and maybe pregnant? GFY.

Can’t get it up? Can’t have THAT.

BTW–that whole “to avoid possible long term damage” thing confuses me. If he needs a pill, isn’t the damage already done?

ps. Hi HITO and javaz!

Report this comment

HITO
Member
HITO

ROFLMAO.

“make the flaccid, mighty” and yes, you are correct, “the damage is already done”.

Sorry guys, not talking to you, but I just marvel at the male decision making society we still are. Have to wonder why they are still in control, actually. Women, wake the hell up and take back what is your due. And pronto please.

Dey don’t leave here. Ever. OK?

Report this comment

deygirl
Member

Or you. 🙂

Report this comment

HITO
Member
HITO

Woman’s right to swear has been invoked:

Never, God Pound Me!

Report this comment

javaz
Member

Hiya Hito!

Couldn’t watch the speeches or votes, but read about them online, and the Republicans shouting down the Democratic women was outrageous, yet shows that the GOP dislike women and strong women with power.
And you are correct, it’s so 19th century where women were thought of as chattel.
Are you going to DC?

(I’m tuckered out from a very long day of grocery shopping, cleaning house and putting up a few Christmas decorations. I start putting things out early for the holidays, don’t ask! 🙂
This old lady has to get to bed, so I hope everyone has a pleasant night and hope to see you tomorrow!)

Report this comment

HITO
Member
HITO

Xmas stuff already? Yikes. I commence my program Thanksgiving weekend. Too much garland and such in the living and dining rooms. Outside lights may go up before, based on weather conditions.

Wish I was going to DC. Wanted to, but got a push back from the old man. And I mean old man. Maybe he’ll come to his senses. (I like dreaming, can you tell?).

Have sweet dreams Javaz. See you tomorrow.

Report this comment

deygirl
Member

Especially interesting when you consider that viagra is the sexual predator’s best friend. I’m not aware of any cases of women using birth control as a means of making themselves more able to commit assault.

Report this comment

PatsyT
Member

Too Funny Deygirl,

Report this comment

deygirl
Member

Hey, PatsyT!

Report this comment

javaz
Member

Hey dey!
Very true.

The health insurance my husband and I have does not cover contraceptives, yet the co-pay for Viagra is ten dollars!
Some thing is very wrong.

Report this comment

AdLib
Admin

Just received this email, thought I’d pass it along:

======================================
Dear Democrat,

Last weekend, Senator Joe Lieberman (I-CT) was all over TV promising to kill healthcare reform by supporting a Republican filibuster. Today, just hours after the House passed its bill, he repeated his threat on FOX.

Even though Lieberman campaigned against President Obama, Senate Democrats let him keep his chairmanship of the Homeland Security Committee because he promised to support Democratic bills. Now he’s broken his promise.

Tell Harry Reid to hold Joe Lieberman accountable for blocking healthcare reform by taking away his committee chair.

Bob Fertik

CREDO Action | more than a network. a movement.

Tell Harry:
Joe Must Go

Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-CT) plans to join with Republicans to filibuster any health care bill that contains a public option. Alone, the Republicans don’t have the votes for a filibuster. So by joining with them, Lieberman would be tipping the balance of power in order to sink health care reform.

We need to push the leaders of the Democratic caucus to take a tough stand against Lieberman. Tell Harry Reid to fire Joe Lieberman as chair of the Homeland Security Committee.

Last year, the New York Times quoted an anonymous “member of the Senate Democratic leadership” who said about Lieberman: “We need every vote. He’s with us on everything but the war.” Apparently Joe lied to the Senate Democrats.

Now is the time for Senate Democratic leadership — Senators Reid, Schumer, and Durbin — to stop making excuses for Joe Lieberman. Harry Reid has shown great leadership in writing a health care bill that includes the public option. But Joe Lieberman is not “with us” on everything but the war. Joe Lieberman’s position is against Senate Democrats, against his constituents in Connecticut and against the will of the American public.

Tell Harry: Joe Must Go

http://www.democrats.com/files/images/joe_must_go_no_lo_go.jpg

Thank you for working to secure real health care reform.

Matt Lockshin, Campaign Manager
CREDO Action from Working Assets

Report this comment

KarateKid
Member

AdLib, I read an article that said Joe will not filibuster, that he developed an appreciation for Harry Reid after Harry declined to punish Joe and allowed him to keep his chairmanship of the Homeland Security Committee.

I guess only time will tell. I don’t expect any healthcare bill in the senate to be done until after the holidays.

Report this comment

AuntieChrist
Member

ALL of these sellouts who would trample on liberty for their own self interests?

I say bring back the public stockade for such traitors.

..but then we would be as bad as them.

Damn it!

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2673/4087604735_407dbd3b0f_o.jpg

Auntie Christ

Report this comment

HITO
Member
HITO

arrgghhhhh, Liarman at his best (and our perceived worst).

Can’t stand him. NY shares a border with CT, makes me nuts that a blue state like CT gave him the ticket to continue with his ineptness and deceipt.

Jeebus, how he got back in on the indie ticket…pathetic. If I was a CT resident, I would hang my head in shame.

Always a repub in disguise that Liarman. He made a run at JohnnyMac to get all warm and fuzzy. Even Mac figured it out.

Sigh.

Report this comment

Corgi Lover
Guest

Evening, HITO. Someone (MLJ) was asking Bits if he had seen her aunties. Would that be anyone we know? I didn’t see a reply.

How did the evening meal go? I nearly said “supper” but that gets involved in regional differences between what is “dinner” and “supper” on Sunday. I’m just a simple Kansas country boy at heart.

Report this comment

HITO
Member
HITO

MLJ? Don’t know that one.

But Lilmartha? That one I know. It’s Lardini’s grand-daughter. She is a cutie just like he.

Bits and Lardini are tight, and that is all good IMO.

Well, fed the crew, but not me yet. I’m becoming my mother, feed the crowd and eat by yourself after you finish all the dishes, so you have absolutely no guilt walking away to get on the Planet for the night. Be back in about 40 minutes.

Report this comment

Corgi Lover
Guest

Hey, HITO, MLJ = MeanLaura. It looked cool but I wasn’t sure.

Report this comment

HITO
Member
HITO

Oh, that could be foxylady.

Report this comment

javaz
Member

Thanks for sharing that!

Report this comment

KevenSeven
Member

Not surprisingly, the conversation has turned to the Senate.

And some discussion of exasperation at “business as usual”.

Regarding the nature and attitude of the Senate and senators:

Clearly the original design of the Senate was to be remote and a break on legislation. (Do not, DO NOT, take these comments as endorsement of the perceived reality. I left that infantile nonsense behind at Huff.)

Remember that senators were originally elected by the various state legislatures. This was deliberately anti-democratic. Add to that the six year term. A long term like that is designed to insulate a senator from public passions. Belt and braces against any democratic influences on senators.

The fact is that the Senate is designed to ignore the will of the people. I’m almost surprised that the “founders” (do not genuflect when you say that) did not make them life-time positions. They did their damnedest.

Add to this nonsense is the awarding of the same number of seats to all states. What could be less democratic? The fact is that the current Democratic Senatorial Caucus represents 2/3rds of America, while the Repug Senatorial Caucus reperesents 1/3rd of America.

These three elements were written into the Constitution. Also in the constitution is the concession that both houses will write their own rules. Someone can remind me of when the filibuster developed. But now we have a situation where senators elected by one third of the nation can stymie the will of two thirds of the nation.

And that is how it is that nothing gets accomplished except in the most extraordinary of times. The Rethugs ran hard to the right in’64, which, in conjunction to the grief of the nation in the murder of JFK, gave LBJ the leverage he needed to pass civil rights. We have the damage that BushCo did to the GOOP brand.

Gotta not let the world forget the damage BushCo did to the GOOP brand, and the nation, while we are chatting.

Anyway, I try as hard as I can to avoid this whole “if only all the good people could get together and do the right thing!” thinking. I find that so tiresome. Yes. It is exhausting to consider the making of the sausage. But it is just juvenile to complain ad nausea about it. It is what it is. We are currently moving forward due to having a charismatic leader and a deranged reactionary GOOP. These elements will not prevail in perpetuity. We must act and act swiftly while the opportunity exists, and work to extend the streak as wisely as we may.

Which precludes excessive griping about the reality of politics, as ugly as it may be.

And I am not wild about this reform bill, but I’ll take what I can get.

If you can find a spare hour, you should listen to: http://www.thisamericanlife.org/Radio_Episode.aspx?sched=1320

None of the cost drivers described are addressed in the bill, to my understanding. And we are talking about the 30% of our health care expenditures that are utterly wasted. Need never have been spent. Money down the rat hole.

Give it a listen.

Report this comment

KarateKid
Member

The Senate is our House of Lords.

Report this comment

bito
Member

The filibuster is covered under “Senate Rule 22”. I Will have to do a search on when it was first imposed. “The Nation” had a good article on it a while ago. As far as your objection with the Senate, that was the “grand compromise” of the convention. Blame Madison. The very word “Democracy” cannot be found in the constitution.The word “republic is used. Fair, unfair? I would hate to see a reopening of the Constitution when most people believe that the “Bill of Rights”need to be changed.

Report this comment

nicole473
Member

A pity we will likely never be allowed to amend the Constitution to change the law of 2 senators per state. Life would be very, very different in these united states.

I am not crazy about this bill either, but it is a whole lot better than nothing, and I have hope that some things will be altered in conference, and perhaps we will add amendments to it in the future. At least it is something.

Btw, LBJ had 68 Dems in the Senate. 295 Dems in the House.

Report this comment

KevenSeven
Member

I am not wild about constructions like “we will not be allowed”. Rhymes with “take my country back”.

Rather say that we will be unlikely to achieve the political strength and the required consensus to change the constitution on this question.

And if we did, how would the Senate differ from the House?

I’d be glad to read your suggestion as to how to adjust this imbalance.

And yes, LBJ had more strength in the two houses, but many of those “Dems” were racist assholes and would switch parties within a few years. Fuckers. They will burn in hell.

Report this comment

nicole473
Member

Touche on wording………concede.

As to the Senate…

I have an idea or two, but surely none that would suit. Nevertheless, I believe that something needs to change because the ruling party should not be forced to constantly perform fellatio on the party which is not in power, and even in performing said fellatio, still come up short.

Report this comment

HITO
Member
HITO

I was a bit disheartened to receive at 1:30 am my weekly OrganizingforAmerica email from Obama requesting a donation. That was what, 2 hours after it passed. They ask for money to get something done, and then they say “hey, we did it, can I have some money”.

Plouffe was better at the donation thing back in the day. Their requests are now so frequent, I barely read them anymore.

Report this comment

Corgi Lover
Guest

Yea, I gave a small donation a few weeks ago to the DNCC and now they just won’t stop calling. And I told them at the time it was all I could give and why.

If you ever want to get even with someone, donate a few dollars to a handful of religious right organizations in their name, and say how much you really love the work they are doing. Include their address and phone number if you can. THey’ll be hounded forever. I love being evil!

Report this comment

SeeknDestroy
Member
SeeknDestroy

Wow.
That is …..well, evil….

You rock, FM..

Report this comment

HITO
Member
HITO

Hysterical!

Have I told you today how brilliant you are?

Report this comment

KevenSeven
Member

That is how politics works.

You may as well go chastize the tides.

Report this comment

HITO
Member
HITO

Having spent the first 20 years of my life living near the beach, I can most assuredly say, chastizing the tides does not work. However, when done at sunrise, it can be a breath-taking experience around August on the Atlantic.

Report this comment

nicole473
Member

WOO HOO!! 😆

Report this comment

SeeknDestroy
Member
SeeknDestroy

Woo Hoo, indeed.
Morning Nicole473.
Good to see you.

Report this comment

nicole473
Member

Good morning, Seek!! Good to see you too.

Report this comment

HITO
Member
HITO

Good morning.

I awoke pondering the Senate, and how they will behave going forward on hc.

In my mind, I equate the House to young adults set loose among themselves who argue more, have a tendency to piss each other off more, but come back to the table quicker.

The Senate…mature adults who know more, know better, but are hesitant to exhibit those traits unless it’s in a demonstrative fashion more about ego.

Round two will be interesting to observe, and hopefully we will see all the details of their discourse.

Report this comment

nellie
Member

I see the House as the people’s voice. I see the Senate as the leftovers from aristocracy — those who think they know better than the people — whether they do or not. That body is apt to protect entrenched interests and have a more authoritarian view of governance. I’m nervous about what they’re going to do with health care, to be honest.

The house comes up for reelection every two years — they feel vulnerable. Senators are in there for six, and they know a lot of voters will forget bad votes by the time they come up for reelection.

Report this comment

HITO
Member
HITO

Hi nellie.

You have eloquently defined what my sleepy head wrote.

The senators do think they know better, but is it based on their constituents’ views, or outside influences? Comes back to lessening their term, and capping their total “service” time.

By example, when I was a school board trustee, I enjoyed how nubie trustees were more engaged and analytical than their long time counterparts who exhibited a “same as it ever was” stance. Fresh ideas, and an “imagine the possibilities” attitude can affect real change.

Report this comment

Corgi Lover
Guest

The Senators have always viewed themselves as Senators, Roman ones. They “know” what’s good for the plebians, or so they think.

Report this comment

HITO
Member
HITO

Oh boy, I’m remembering PBS’s “I, Claudius”. Those Roman Senators were a nasty bunch.

Caligula = GWB?

Report this comment

kesmarn
Admin

Or maybe they see themselves as the House of Lords as opposed to the House of Commons!

Report this comment

nellie
Member

Morning, Hito!

I think shortening the term is a GREAT idea. I love it, but who’s going to do it????

I’ve never liked term limits, but I do like mandatory retirement age. At some point, people are too mired in the past, and they can’t see beyond their own experiences. And younger people know better where the country is. And their imaginations haven’t been jaded, just as you said.

Report this comment

SeeknDestroy
Member
SeeknDestroy

Well said HITO.
Good Morning, good to see you.
It shall be interesting to say the least.

Report this comment

HITO
Member
HITO

Morning Seek. We really need to take out the microscope for the senators on this issue. Hopefully MSM will report with accuracy. (must still be asleep and dreaming)

Report this comment

SeeknDestroy
Member
SeeknDestroy

Heh…..MSM….accuracy….ILK……

Report this comment

Corgi Lover
Guest

Morning HITO. You work within the system more. Me, I try but don’t always want to play games. Revolution!

Report this comment

HITO
Member
HITO

Same as it ever was, same as it ever was?

I hate games FM. But I am known to love a good round of Scrabble and Pictionary.

My local obama-ians are planning a caravan to DC on Nov. 19 which includes a white house tour and a face to face with Gillibrand for 15 minutes. Very tempting to go indeed.

Report this comment

Corgi Lover
Guest

IF I had the centagos I’d join you.

All I ever get to play is strip solitaire. What a bummer.

Report this comment

HITO
Member
HITO

LOL.

Bet you win all the time.

Report this comment

Corgi Lover
Guest

Hands down, so to speak.

Report this comment

SeeknDestroy
Member
SeeknDestroy

Morning FM.
Good to see you.

Report this comment

BigDogMom
Member
BigDogMom

Well everyone have a wonderful day, I’m off to enjoy the sunshine with my dogs…

Report this comment

nellie
Member

Morning everyone! (my manners really need some polishing!)

Helpful breakdown of the vote:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/special/politics/votes/house/healthcare/index.html

Pilfered from a post on another site which shall remain nameless.

Report this comment

SeeknDestroy
Member
SeeknDestroy

Thanks for the info, Nellie.
Much appreciation.

Report this comment

BigDogMom
Member
BigDogMom

Morning nellie, thanks for the breakdown, will look at it later…and you didn’t pilfer, you just borrowed it for a little while!

Report this comment

BigDogMom
Member
BigDogMom

“A journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step.”

Confucius

This is our first step to many more, we are coming out of the dark ages and into the renaissance era….patience and diligence from all of us will get us where we want to go….

I’ll say one more thing…Yeeehhhhhh!!!!!!!

Report this comment

javaz
Member

Morning BDM!
It’s a beautiful day!

Report this comment

BigDogMom
Member
BigDogMom

Morning, your up early! Yes it is a beautiful day in many ways…just on my way out to walk the dogs. Stopped by HP, getting so that I don’t even want to go there anymore, the main thread on the vote last night is going fast and furious.

Will be back later, hope all is well with you..

Report this comment

javaz
Member

Wonderful morning to all!
It’s great to wake up to good news!

Report this comment

TheLateGrardini
Guest

That was nerve wracking as hell watching that vote on CSPAN last night. I hadn’t been that nervous since my daughter was born back in ’85!

Report this comment

BigDogMom
Member
BigDogMom

Morning, had to turn if off last night, the nay sayers where getting to me, then I fell asleep on the couch, only to have hubby wake me up to tell me that it passed…this was as bad as watching the vote count on election night!

Report this comment

nellie
Member

I kept seeing the vote stuck at 213 and after that wretched amendment passed, I really didn’t know what to expect.

After a day of watching the GOP lie about everything and repeat the same talking points for 11 hours, I was wiped out. I went to sleep right after the vote. That was early in CA!

Report this comment

BigDogMom
Member
BigDogMom

Yeh…rashioning of healthcare, higher taxes, death panels, the deficit that our children will have, yadda, yadda, our children, yadda, yadda, medicare,yadda, yadda….

Report this comment

javaz
Member

Morning TGL!
I was awakened by loud popping noises and didn’t know what the heck was going on and then I turned on the tee-vee, and realized it was sounds of Republican heads imploding!

🙂

Report this comment