Displaying 961 To 990 Of 4,640 Comments Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito’s “Caskets R Us!” No! I clicked the link. I have been having the same problem with picture myself today. I would never laugh about that. 😉 » Posted By SallyT On March 30, 2012 @ 6:09 pm Cher, that is cracking me up!! 😆 😆 😆 😆 » Posted By SallyT On March 30, 2012 @ 6:04 pm KT, now that is just right!!!! » Posted By SallyT On March 30, 2012 @ 5:59 pm Well, since BMW has recalled 367,000 cars in the US, I say we bury Scott Walker in one. [img]http://www.trbimg.com/img-4f71d1ec/turbine/la-fi-mo-bmw-recall-20120327-001/600[/img] » Posted By SallyT On March 30, 2012 @ 5:42 pm Gingrich in a janitor’s cart. [img]http://www.wholesalejanitorialsupply.com/images/100/facility.jpg[/img] » Posted By SallyT On March 30, 2012 @ 5:09 pm Perfect!!!! 😆 😆 » Posted By SallyT On March 30, 2012 @ 5:02 pm Okay, Michelle Bachmann in a box of Ex-Lax and her husband in a back door. [img]http://th1070.photobucket.com/albums/u492/PeaceofMindPropertyManagement/8497%20India%20Ave%20Insp%203-21-12/th_DSC06826.jpg[/img] » Posted By SallyT On March 30, 2012 @ 4:43 pm OMG, KT! 😆 😆 » Posted By SallyT On March 30, 2012 @ 4:36 pm KT, I once told someone that I wanted to be cremated and they told me, “Oh Sally, we always have known you want to die in heat.” Well, maybe……but after the act and with a smile on my face. 😉 » Posted By SallyT On March 30, 2012 @ 3:50 pm AdLib, can we put Sarah Palin on a Viking ship and push her towards Russia? » Posted By SallyT On March 30, 2012 @ 3:46 pm I’d say that would work just fine, AdLib! I had been looking for a box of Trojans and there was a box that said “Pleasures” “Fire & Ice” “Warming and Tingling Sensations for both partners”. Now there might be a problem with that word “partners” because it doesn’t say for man & woman and could mean man & man or woman & woman or dog & man or……..oh hell, you get the message. I couldn’t get the picture to print. » Posted By SallyT On March 30, 2012 @ 3:41 pm CL, I hope I can always be there to help make your day because when I have done that, I have made my as well! Luv ya! 🙂 » Posted By SallyT On March 30, 2012 @ 2:02 pm Okay, AdLib, I will repeat mine from last night just because it made Choicelady chuckle out loud. Santorum should be buried in a prophylactic or a provolatics, which is an empty box of prophylactics. http://normandcompany.com/SMMM4B/provolactics.html [img]http://normandcompany.com/SMMM4B/provolactics.html[/img] And, Ron Paul needs a white sheet with a hoodie! One that covers the whole head with holes for the eyes. But, as I said earlier, I think he might have already planned for this in his will. 🙂 » Posted By SallyT On March 30, 2012 @ 12:45 pm Cher, I don’t know if you got to watch Rachel Maddow’s show last night but it was pretty amazing to see them go back and show how the Supreme Court Justices were using talking points from the Tea Party! http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26315908/#46900242 » Posted By SallyT On March 30, 2012 @ 2:40 pm What If? The Affordable Care Act and the Supreme Court KQ, 🙂 ! » Posted By SallyT On March 27, 2012 @ 9:36 pm Good recap of today’s arguments. http://www.scotusblog.com/2012/03/argument-recap-it-is-kennedys-call/ » Posted By SallyT On March 27, 2012 @ 8:39 pm Well, make sure they don’t make you add that broccoli! 😉 » Posted By SallyT On March 27, 2012 @ 6:56 pm Escrib, well, stay off of TCM (Turner Class) tonight. They aren’t helping because tonight they are playing “Cape Fear” followed by “River of No Return” that is then followed by “The Night of the Hunter” and ending the night programming with the movie “Rampage”. Talk about living my life in the movies in one night!!!! 😯 Yes, Gidget sounds much better! » Posted By SallyT On March 27, 2012 @ 3:12 pm Khirad, I can’t remember those damn cases today! And, today I can see Russia from my house! 🙂 » Posted By SallyT On March 27, 2012 @ 3:04 pm Cher, I do think a lot of this is theatrical. I have heard the Justices ask questions in the past that would lead you to think they are going to vote one way and they turn around and vote the opposite. You can call me Sarah Palin for now because I can’t name an exact case to point to for an example but I do recall my thinking at the time that lead me to think this now. 🙄 » Posted By SallyT On March 27, 2012 @ 2:33 pm Hello lowskiesgirl, I understand your frustrations in living in a different country and how things there are compared to here. It lets you see how narrow our own country can be on certain issues. I have never lived outside of the US but I can relate with you in just wishing some of my friends would move out of the MidWest for awhile here. They would see that life can be more open and appealing along with certainly less racists in different sections of this country as well. Sometimes you just want to yell, “WAKE UP! 🙂 » Posted By SallyT On March 27, 2012 @ 2:25 pm Well, Funk, I guess they talked a little about this “penalty” today. I don’t know if anything was answered yet, tho. Is it a tax or is it not???? “The justices saw this seeming incongruity coming.” Justice Samuel Alito Jr Verrilli replied that he could not point to a case, but added that the Supreme Court has held in other cases that “something can be a constitutional exercise of the taxing power whether or not it is called a tax.” http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/760921?sssdmh=dm1.770736 » Posted By SallyT On March 26, 2012 @ 8:27 pm Murph, thank you for all this information. Very helpful. I personally think that some of the problem with all this is because so much of the benefits don’t kick in until 2014 and people haven’t experienced them yet. I have read that even people that say they are against the ACA and want it overturned still want Congress to keep the parts that have kicked in like keeping children on parents insurance plans until 26 and the pre-existing clause. These they have experience and like them. If they had have more of it and lived with it, I think there would be many more for it in its entirety. Not everyone was for Medicare when it was introduced but you will play hell in trying to get it away now. Yes, they are trying but that is a fight to be had and I don’t think they can even imagine the fight they will face! » Posted By SallyT On March 26, 2012 @ 7:37 pm I thought that the ACA does not give anything on how to enforce a penalty, therefore, there really is no penalty. I thought that was a problem also for the SCOTUS to rule on because there is no penalty. » Posted By SallyT On March 26, 2012 @ 7:28 pm KT, I knew that you would be a good writer and I am so happy you did it! It appears that you come away with a spirituality of your own when you interpret the passages with your feelings and needs at the time of each read. You may discover something new with each of your personal situations in time. I have had others tell me that they had problems with AA for the same reasons you stated. I am glad that your daughter gave you something to help you through that time and something you can have to fall back on now when you need too. That has to be a comfort. I enjoyed listening to the link you gave. Thank you for sharing this with us. » Posted By SallyT On March 25, 2012 @ 6:51 pm What a fun thread! Thanks AdLib for a funny time tonight for us all! » Posted By SallyT On March 22, 2012 @ 12:06 am Well, Romney’s campaign spokesman certainly was playing this game today! [img]http://img2.imagesbn.com/images/110930000/110938604.jpg[/img] » Posted By SallyT On March 21, 2012 @ 9:43 pm Well, KT, it is certainly this for the rest of us should one of them make it: [img]http://img2.imagesbn.com/images/101460000/101467223.jpg[/img] » Posted By SallyT On March 21, 2012 @ 9:27 pm By George, AdLib, I think he did! » Posted By SallyT On March 21, 2012 @ 9:24 pm It could be, KT! I like the “Buy the numbers” on there, too. That is so fitting for Romney’s campaign, isn’t it! » Posted By SallyT On March 21, 2012 @ 9:23 pmComments Posted By SallyT
See I thought it would be a punishment for him because he doesn’t believe in birth control but WOW you could really pull it off! Or should I say on????
“Today you are arguing that the penalty is not a tax,” Justice Samuel Alito Jr said. “Tomorrow you are going to be back and you will be arguing that the penalty is a tax. Has the Court ever held that something that is a tax for purposes of the taxing power under the Constitution is not a tax under the Anti-Injunction Act?”
«« Back To Stats Page
Home Stats