The Price Of Indifference
Gerrymandering:
If the United States Supreme Court were to have only one responsibility, I would have it be to protect the vote and the voter. But, the sad truth is that a highly organized effort to make sure that no vote is ever fair has plagued us almost from the founding of the country. Gerrymandering (under whatever name): the drawing of district boundaries for political advantage. This perpetual conspiracy to dilute and undermine the Constitution, corrupt the Congress – and devalue our votes, is the foundation of our modern Tower of Babel. The perpetrators use the Courts to their advantage by turning every problem into a Medusa. And the USSC, dazzled by endless reflections of themselves, are impotent. They play roles, but now without responsibility or consequence. They are self-proclaimed to be without power or authority, so they judge only from their lofty thrones, while Truth dies by the wayside.
The Electoral College:
A shadowy group of Elites ultimately decides American presidential elections. Some are accountable to the states, but if even one is unbound, he or she can decide an election. There is no justification for the existence of the Electoral College that makes sense in the Age of the Internet: it serves no purpose, except to distance the voters from their rightful authority. If all else fails, Trump will club a few members of the Electoral College over the head and win in 2020 by fraud and force. Like we always knew that he would.
The Primary Process:
When the now impeached president Donald Trump won the State of South Carolina in the primary of 2016, he did it with about 39% of the vote. He didn’t necessarily get a plurality – the process in S.C. was corrupted in so many ways that the results are not necessarily valid, or particularly meaningful. Regardless, the next morning all of South Carolina’s nominating votes were in Trump’s column. Say what! Yep, “People who did not vote for Trump played crucial roles in getting Trump elected! “All-or-nothing”, also, is pure idiocy. It is simply disenfranchisement.
Foreign Election Interference:
Trump has thrown our democracy to the wolves. He couldn’t even leave it alone for the Holidays, inviting more and more countries to influence and manipulate our electoral processes and elections at will. That’s the subject of the attached article. And still, the problem is much larger than the Public know; and still, crimes are being openly committed while the Justice Department does not a damn thing, their hands tied by partisanship, alter egos of the Mafia that they are.
Dirty Tricks and Lies, the Death of a Thousand Cuts:
On Election Day, 2016, I received a letter from the County Registrar. So did everyone else in the county. It said that my vote: “might not count,” that “some” ballots, “might not be valid.”
I immediately called the state’s Attorney General’s office. A junior flunky passed the buck, winked (over the phone) and reminded me that the Registrar was a close friend of his. That’s all. It must have happened a thousand times that day. I started logging incidents of dirty tricks and lies – on Election Day and gave up when I realized that it would be a more-than-full-time job.
In the Eighties, if you had hung all the Governors convicted of election interference, you would have run out of rope. But, nothing changed. Politicians seek power and shirk responsibility. And that is all. Truth be damned.
Influencers:
I grind my teeth, and curse them to hell when I think of the very word: “influencer.” Whether preachers, dishonorable politicians, or the asylum truants on Fox; they must sooner or later bear much of the blame – in proportion to the attention that they demanded – for the harm they have done. They seem to think that there is no punishment for spreading lies, for slandering; not even for outright treason. Not for stealing information, or colluding with enemies; and aiding and abetting known criminals and foreign spies in brainwashing us and defrauding us. Their goal is to make it impossible for us to make decisions for ourselves. All influencers are thieves. And if they can’t change your heart, they change your mind. (Think about that.)
Rural Preference:
This is also another permanent, set-in-granite, “feature” of our government. It is deeply embedded with racism, and white supremacy. It is a vestige of slavery. If you turn the clock back, “rural preference” becomes: “rural slave-owners, a tiny minority, had greater power than everyone else put together.”) Today, it means pretty much the same thing.
The Perverted Parliamentarians:
There is not a single word in the Constitution that even suggests that Mitch “the Grim Reaper” McConnell has the authority to shut down Congress by misusing his power as Chair. Or Paul Ryan. This is simply a crude, vulgar display of contempt for the Constitution. And, once again, it distances the voter from the actual seats of power. McConnell acts as though he is absolutely untouchable and invulnerable. Why doesn’t he defect to Russia? He isn’t an American.
Violence, And The Threat Of Violence:
For the last quarter-century, Republican thugs have threatened us with violence if we disagree with them. They threaten the old and frail. They block physical access to polling places. They disrupt town meetings. They threaten civil war, or indiscriminate genocide (“kill all the males”). And their sedition experts terrorize. The police have washed their hands of the matter, and the clergy has absolved themselves of blame. The President supports violence and has said so countless times. He doesn’t care for Democracy: it’s a nuisance.
A Democracy? I’m not so sure. Democracy was a goal. A dream. But dreamlike, it now fades into the distance. And we hang our heads like oft-beaten ragamuffins; more in shame than in fear. The price of indifference.
No, the USA has never been a democracy. The founders and framers of the Constitution laid a framework for a democracy and they set a goal of becoming a more perfect union. I suppose it is unquestionable that we have become a “more” perfect union, but we are a long way from being perfect.
Absolutely. Built on slavery but a democracy.
It is still not a democracy. Yes, we CLAIM to be a democracy, but we are far from it. Currently 538 people get to decide who our president is, in spite of how over 120 million people voted. Nine people get to decide what our Constitution actually says, based on political ideology. Our so-called justice system could not be more unjust. Well, I guess it COULD be, but not by much.
What is a democracy? Let us us start from the beginning.
A basic tenet of democracy is majority rule. We have never had that, even through our representative government. When a presidential candidate receives 3 million more votes than her opponent, but the one who received fewer votes wins, that is NOT democracy. When nine people are able to determine what our Constitution says, in their opinions, not based on the intent of the law, but rather on political ideology, that is not democracy. Yet, a “democratic” process is required to change these undemocratic laws, that were not originally put in plant by democracy.
Indeed, you got democracy! It is what you were supposed to vote for!
I suspect you know this, but maybe you view it in a different perspective than I do. When our country began, only white male landowners could vote. For a brief period after the civil war, black men could vote, but that did not last very long. It wasn’t until 1920 that even white women could vote, and it wasn’t until 1965 that black people could vote again.
Today, for whatever reason(s), in most national elections fewer than 60% of eligible voters vote.
So, you were saying???
Russia is clearly way ahead on a Space Force. If they have a hyperspeed nuclear missile (17,500 mph), then they outclass us without going into space. They probably do. The technical ability already exists.
I talk with my dad about all this. I am definitely grateful for his wisdom. It’s been a long time, but I miss a few that passed on here with similar wisdom.
The purism I’ve seen on the so-called left.
It all ignores this basic set of facts about our government in America and its foundations.
I applaud the enthusiasm for progressive values – but it’s almost like the other side of the coin of Trumpism in certain respects.
There are other democratic systems of interest to me. Proportional voting, other quite convoluted systems of preferential voting.
I for one scratch my head at how candidates in countries derived from the British system can just choose to run in another constituency without even living there for long.
But try explaining the Electoral College? It’s fair that Wyoming has representation, but shrubbery shouldn’t count for even two senate seats when D.C., let alone Puerto Rico have no say. Of course those are two separate issues constitutionally, but they strike a similar vein in my mind about who has power.
The sore spot with the so-called left in America who were too pure is the Supreme Court. The right is more organized and has a longer view – even if they just want to send women back to alleys and the kitchen.
Did you hate Hillary I ask? Good for you, but she would have never nominated a Kavanaugh. Those are life time appointments, you can put up with her for 4-8 years. Silence.
My first vote was for Nader. Silence. I’m feeling my own post coming on where I’ve seen the left become as rabid as the right. Being called a centrist, Neo-lib, corporatist Dem on one side and from the other being called a commie f*g big government loser.
What we are missing are the fundamentals layed out here. My dad talks about how the so-called hippies were as clueless even as he hated Nixon. Yeah, call me a centrist. I’m about what can be done, and trying to change what can’t yet – not yelling into a bag of Doritos.
That’s what I’ve been harping on, that neither party is any good at discerning political realities, and that the Democratic Party has failed miserably to understand the mind of the public.
Hillary? A First Lady with a rather unspectacular career as a civil servant, who had a shot at the Bigs; but blew it because she failed to actually say anything. She became a live target for the Base. They killed her political aspirations. I would never have voted for her, because she was in the inner circle of the devisers of the “War on Drugs/The People.” I have often said that Hillary Clinton eats sh*t and runs rabbits; but I have never once called her a “bitch.” I swear.
I held my nose. She was qualified. She could just never get out of her own way. Ancient history. I’ll die and Kavanaugh will sit on the bench.
She could never get out of her own way? Please expound. She won the popular vote. She underwent a fake FBI investigation during her campaign, while her opponent’s FBI investigation was kept secret. Her opponent worked with Putin to interfere in the election and PROBABLY even changed ballots. She is a WOMAN! Give me ONE person who could have or have done what she did, with those things against them.
PLUS, everything non-republicans held against her, they are willing to excuse them with other people. For instance, the 1994 crime bill that she could not have voted for, but Biden actually helped to write. Or the resolution to support Bush’s effort to ask the U.N. to send weapons inspectors back to Iraq. Sanders says he voted against the war with Iraq, and Obama campaigned on saying he would have voted against that war. The FACT is there was never a vote in Congress to go to war with Iraq. Instead Bush used a resolution that was sold to the American public and Congress as a peace resolution, to illegally invade Iraq. And Democrats let him off the hook by promoting the notion that Hillary Clinton voted for a war with Iraq, and John Kerry voted for a funding bill before he voted against it. This supports that if Democratic voters had a rabbit’s brain, they would hop backwards.
Comments like this at the very least feeds into the lies republicans have promoted about Hillary Clinton for almost three decades. If the people who constantly criticize Hillary had a very small fraction of her grace and integrity, the world would be a better place. I would venture to say that she has probably never called you a “bitch” either.
Oh yes she has! And she’s called me worse than that. She should have been the President most identified with my generation, the Counterculture. We don’t get to have “our” President though. But, if there is one lesson learned in the last two years, it is that they are all far too much alike. We were informed by art: the photos of the Clintons at trump’s wedding, and of them all partying with that dumb patsy, Jeffrey Epstein. And many of us acknowledged what we should have known all the time.
To say that what I’m saying supports Republican criticisms of Sec. Clinton. I think that’s simply not true. Let the readers be the judge.
I call telling the truth being loyal to my party. Ive been a Democrat for about a half-century. I’ve worked for a Republican governor, with a Democratic Chief of Staff. I’ve made tv commercials for democratic candidates. I helped a Republican First Lady achieve a dream. The widow of Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King hugged me warmly, and said, “thank you for your service. I think that I’m a Democrat.
Also, your retort does not mention my main point. That’s interesting. I didn’t expect that from you.
I am not sure what your main point is/was. So the Clintons are bad people because they attended one of trump’s weddings? I am sure you are proud of your accolades, but I am not sure how that is relevant to this discussion.
I have read reports that trump and Epstein together raped a 13 year old girl. I also read where Bill Clinton was on a plane trip with Epstein related to something having to do with the Clinton Foundation. In point of fact, I read as recently as today that Epstein had donated money to MIT. I suppose that makes MIT a child molester?
I don’t begrudge you your opinions and perspectives, but I prefer dealing in facts.
I don’t understand how the Clintons are still relevant.
EVERYONE is still relevant. Bill and Hillary Clinton were two of the most savvy politicians in modern history, and they COULD help to move the Democratic Party, and more importantly, the country forward. Hillary is even more relevant because of the way she was treated when she ran for president, SIMPLY BECAUSE SHE IS A WOMAN. Until America reconciles that, we are stuck on stupid, as evidenced by the fact that at least forty percent of us made a “binary choice” that someone with the moral character of trump was even CLOSE to a better choice than Hillary.
She is not. She was screwed over. She is not relevant. I love talking about history. I want to talk about the future.
In your opinion she is not. In my opinion she is. Hillary is currently involved in helping people run for public office, among other things that are relevant to the future. The future is shaped by how we respond to the past and the present.
Either way, not my bailiwick.
Everyone is entitle to their preferences. I disagree with almost everything in your post, but I respect your right to say it. I don’t see any value in degrading people who have a history of helping others. It is extremely difficult for me not to degrade people like trump and his supporters. I guess I have to feel comfort in knowing that I actually don’t degrade people, but I do degrade their words and their actions.
I certainly admire Sec. Clinton’s courage and grace. Her life was in danger every second on the campaign trail. But, when an attacker attempted to charge the stage at an event where she was speaking, she didn’t flinch, or back off even a millimeter. She gently laid her hand on the arm of the giant at her side, and he froze, as if enchanted. When nearly the same thing happened to trump, he had to be dragged offstage, with two giants supporting him by his upper arms.
But, do you remember the girl (she was a girl when it started) from Nebraska who passed a joint at a party. That was determined to be “possession,” and she received a mandatory punishment of life imprisonment.
I can’t forget her, or the five million who have crushed, their families ripped apart, because of a ridiculous prejudice. I think it is perfectly fair that Bill and Hillary Clinton take their share of the blame for this atrocity. There are millions of people who think like I do.
And you are entitled to close your eyes to this monstrous injustice and ignore the 500 lb. gorilla sitting on your couch. I am obliged not to.
I think you and I had similar discussions when we were on Yabberz. The so-called war of drugs began under the Reagan administration. Neither Bill or Hillary had anything to do with that. If you are referencing the 1994 crime bill, which I supported because gangs and drug dealers were killing innocent men, women and children IN MY NEIGHBORHOOD, republicans used that bill as a racist tool rather than to prosecute criminals. Not to get into a back and forth about our different perspectives, but you can close your eyes to what actually happened related to the crime bill.
Wasn’t it Joe Biden who said, “I can’t wait to bulldoze the house of one of them.” My main point was about racism and injustice. But, you knew that, I think. Yes, the Nixon administration coined the phrase; but the Clintons should have known better. Many things that the Clintons did were inexplicable: like the missile attacks on Sarajevo.
I didn’t say there was one picture. You said that. And that is trolling.
Prohibition doesn’t work! The various prohibitions have never worked. They increase smuggling, enable and support organized crime; and they bury people alive in a hellish prison system who have done no harm. Of course drugs are an escape. From people like you. People who never fairly discuss any subject. You edit “my beliefs.” That’s the key to trollery, isn’t it? To answer every question partially. My writing is intended to be considered as a whole. I’m sorry that you didn’t understand that my main point was injustice. I will try harder.
I don’t recall saying anything about a picture. Also, by saying that you and I were on Yabberz is revealing your identity and could possibly get you killed???
I don’t recall the environment around how the U.S. got involved in the civil war in Yugoslovia, but I believe it was NATO that bombed them, not the USA. My son actually served with a peacekeeping force in that war.
I have hear this statement a lot regarding the Clintons. Hillary should have known that George W Bush was going to hijack the Resolution To Use Military Force Against Iraq as an excuse to invade Iraq. Bill should have known better about something related to how republicans abused and misapplied the 1994 crime bill.
You can disagree with the someone’s decisions, but to hold them accountable for something that someone else did because YOU think they should have known better is pretty condescending.
I am a black male who grew up in the southern USA during Jim Crow when NO ONE apologized for oppressing and exploiting black people. So, I don’t need ANYONE to lecture me about a hellish system. Been there, and done that!
You just gave out information that could reveal my identify – and possibly get me killed. I think you did it on porpose.
Can we pick one thing to disagree on? Like how I degrade people? Your opinions and your life experience are worth listening to.
This post was what was on my mind when I responded to your post. You did not post this, so I was not saying YOU degraded anyone. I just said I don’t see any value in that. Actually, as I re-read your post that I responded to, I agree with most of it. I have never been one to cast a protest vote though. Voting for Nader, to me, is a protest vote.
wrong post.