744437_c390c294
I came across a few columns that I thought that you might find interesting.   The reason that I get to write this column is that I have a new metaphor for these other guys’ point.

Why do we, progressives, lose more than we win?   We lose because we almost always play offense, and the reactionaries, by definition, are almost always playing defense.

Any student of military tactics will tell you that the defense always has an easier task.   We are the change agents.  We attempt to change the status quo.   Look for a moment at the features of our society and government that we have instituted, consider how much work they required to accomplish.   An end to human chattel.   Suffrage for women.  Social Security,   Actual goddam civil rights for black folk.   Then consider the judicial accident of Roe v Wade.   (Accident in the sense that it was not the result of extended political action.)   Those are now a part of the status quo.   Those would all require enormous effort to reverse.   (The Rethugs have no hope or expectation of reversing Roe v Wade, it would be the destruction of their party.   It is only a sop to the deranged religious zealots in their ranks.)

For every effort in social progress that we bring to the table, climate change or universal health care, we are the army storming the castle.   The Reactionaries have the castle.   It take a lot less people to stand at the top of the castle and dump rocks and boiling oil down on the besiegers than it does to bring the ladders and grappling hooks.

The status quo has the inertia of citizens’ fear of change.   The status quo can lie about death panels and granny croaking sooner, and we as the stormers of the castle cannot stop each of those arrows from reaching the electorate.

Progress is a king bitch.   It is the slow boring of boards, and we risk our soul in the effort.

What is astonishing to me?    That the whole teabagger campaign of the summer was a perfect reflection of the swiftboating of Kerry, and again, the Democrats were so goddam slow to respond.   We let way too many lies get past us, and did not get up and fight back at the level necessary to win this.  Our response was exactly as weak as that of Kerry’s campaign to the swiftboating.

You can find the thread of columns that discuss this further at: http://www.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/2009/12/16/asymm_majs/index.html

21
Leave a Comment

Please Login to comment
8 Comment threads
13 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
9 Comment authors
boomer1949AthenanellieKQuarkkesmarn Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Athena
Member
Athena

A great image it is – Transylvania, I presume.
I am disappointed that Obama isn’t declaring what exactly he will sign into law. Does that mean anything with Health Care Reform written on will be signed by him? Where does he draw the line?
I think the reason this Health Care Reform debate is so endless is because it avoids as much price control as it can. All who are feeding at the current trough of run away medical cost, must be allowed to continue. That seems to be giant flaw in the entire “reform”.

Report this comment

nellie
Member

I have to take issue with the idea that we get our butts kicked. The advances you listed show that when a progressive movement wins a victory, it’s a permanent win — unless something extraordinary happens. Our policies become part of the status quo. Conservatives eventually come to see progressive ideas as the norm, and progressives move on to the next battle. When we take a hill, we keep it.

It just takes a lot effort to conquer that hill. I think we get too discouraged too quickly. Civil rights for people with African heritage took 400 years on this continent. Gays are still fighting for basic rights. Change is slow—not so much because people are afraid of it as the fact that the status quo has made the powerful their money, and they want to keep it. That means keeping things as they are. So they work hard at making others afraid to change anything

I think of what my parents had to go through every day just going to work, just because of their ethnic heritage, and how they hung in there for years and years and years, toughing it out every single damned day. So that I would have an easier time than they did.

Progressives need to toughen up. And hang in there. And not give up or turn their backs because things get difficult. When things get rough, that’s a sure sign we’re about to accomplish something.

Report this comment

KQµårk 死神
Member

It’s more basic than that. The political center of this country is center right with a pretty large skew to the right I might add.

fff

Can you imagine that most people identify themselves as conservative AFTER Bush?

While at the core I think Americans are center left it does not matter because only perception matters today. As long as liberal equated to “tax and spend”, lenient on crime, weak on national security etc the true face of the center left nation will not shine through. Those perceptions simply have not changed for most Americans. That’s why Democrats should have fully de-branded from the term “liberal” and called ourselves progressives all the time. But the cat herd with it’s millions of unique voices has no idea how to stay on message with anything.

Face it we only win national elections when conservatives really fuck things up bad. By the time anti-incumbency sentiment rolls around again people are happy to vote those crazy liberals out of office. Democrats are the necessary evil for moderates. The only way to shift this country back again is through steady incremental progress that does not scare people away so that we can shift the political center of this country instead of it shifting us.

To put it in military terms we are outnumbered 2-1.

Report this comment

kesmarn
Admin

That’s a great image attached, K7.

Here’s how bummed out I feel today.

I’m going to say something mean, politically incorrect and elitist.

The other primary reason it’s so hard for Progressives to win the day is that only 2% of the population has an IQ over 130.

It’s hard to find a way to talk to the other 98%.

Now my Catholic guilt is rolling in…..

Report this comment

javaz
Member

Hey!
I resemble that remark!

Report this comment

boomer1949
Member
kesmarn
Admin

Uh-oh. Now I’ve gone and done it. It goes without saying that all the Planeteers are among the elite! 😮

Report this comment

kesmarn
Admin

LOL! j’avaz!

You are in the top 2% any day!

Report this comment

Khirad
Member

Loved the analogy. Also, unlike the right, we want that castle. Simply setting up a trebuchet and hurling Byzentine fire or dead cows is their thing. And, we want something left after we take it. Their whole ideology is about dismantling and demolishing the castle.

What the progressive legislators needed was either a secret breach, or better yet, sustained cover volleys as they roll up the battering ram. And this includes counter demonstrations against teabaggers. That was sadly lacking. That’s another thing. The political physics – and human nature – of it being easier to moblize and fire up dissent than support.

Report this comment

bito
Member

Reminds me of a Mark Twain yarn. An organizer for pubic debate asked Twain to participate. Fully expecting getting turned down, he was prepare with his pleas.Shocked, Twain said “yes, as long as I can have the “con” position. The man asked why and Twin replied ” It’s easy to oppose most anything and you don’t have to prepare.”

Report this comment

javaz
Member

I agree, Keven, and share in the disgust with Democrats and Progressives for not fighting back quicker and harder.
But even when the Dems and Progressives push back, the MSM ignores them, and instead focuses on the Repubs and Teabaggers, or at the very least, gives them more air time.

How do Progressives fight against the MSM, which has a bias towards the Republicans?
That’s the real question.
How do Democrats and Progressives obtain equal air time?

Report this comment