Displaying 31 To 52 Of 52 Comments I would betcha too, there will be at least another couple of new articles on Palin in the next 24 hours. Arianna needs to keep her ‘trolls’ interested and as active on her site. Unless and of course, Obama makes a statement on ANYTHING and she will drop that in as front page news poste haste with the usual doubts about what he is doing. Following with an article, of course, on Palin “right below”. She needs a deflection from all the defections. » Posted By Wiseronenow On February 8, 2011 @ 3:30 am Howie may have finally got the cajonnes to make that statement because he may have gotten word that there might not be a place for him in the new merger. Watch some of the articles there going forward on this new merger and who sucks up the loudest. That will say a lot. Wondering what Jason Linkins will say about it all. I predict he will make his commentary for his Sunday blog and he will be brief and lukewarm and move on quickly. » Posted By Wiseronenow On February 8, 2011 @ 2:42 am Thanks so much! Wish I could log off for the night, but my day is just beginning. Have a wonderful one! » Posted By Wiseronenow On February 8, 2011 @ 2:37 am Remember, Arianna has always used as a driving force on her site to change the direction of dialogue by inciting disent amongst, and particularly, the progressives. I bet she got more bang for her buck with having the progressive turn on each other in their commentary than any trolls posting. So, it will be no different with this latest news from her. It can be seen already on HP. The line is being drawn in the sand. A progressive expresses dissatisfaction or should I say, freedom of speech, about her decision and almost immediately a comment is posted with no moderation giving her Kudo’s. So, if you thought that site was heavily moderated before, ain’t seen nuttin yet. » Posted By Wiseronenow On February 8, 2011 @ 2:33 am Thanks, appreciate the follow up. Not surprised in the least her behavior and demanding that Gibbs bow to her wishes. Also, here, there is an article on her “date” with Issa in Vegas. I was awaiting for some report, anywhere, on how she was escourted off the plane upon leaving Vegas because she wouldn’t stop using her Blackberry. ‘Tis true. But, nuttin. None of MSM reported on that. Not so strange bedfellows and gal. Guess, she can buy her own plane now. » Posted By Wiseronenow On February 8, 2011 @ 2:23 am I always found it curious that Arianna had never been invited to the White House Correspondence dinner. And, we surely know she would have written about it. Maybe, I missed that she was, but I don’t think so. I recall Olberman being in the audience and other progressives, but not her. Yet, she cozy ups with the likes of Issa. » Posted By Wiseronenow On February 8, 2011 @ 1:25 am As we all know, she has already started blanketing the cable and other shows with the reasons for her decision and sendng out the likes of Sekoff to do her bidding. I’m hoping that at some point there will be at least one talking head to mention the disappointment and defection of many from her site so as to start a dialogue in that regard other than the spin she is driving. The mention of this site and others similar would help. » Posted By Wiseronenow On February 8, 2011 @ 12:57 am Good suggestions. I also suggest that our defection needs to be recognized on a wider platform to counter the spin that is being put out there now by Arianna’s minion’s. I’m hoping it will be recognized or at least as a topic of conversation whenever she appears on tv or those who do her biding. A good start would be to write the likes of Bill Maher’s show or others who follow all this and let him know about the exodus and why. Arianna should have no trouble with freedom of speech, right? Yeah, sure. » Posted By Wiseronenow On February 8, 2011 @ 12:47 am Good day, all! Glad to see many more have come over from HP. I noticed after many post’s there expressing disappointment with her decision and then subsequent comments about leaving, the type of comments that were then posted only supported Arianna. Once again, manipulating the commentary to drive her agenda and little else, which it seems she had been doing all along. Nothing new. Figured that one out earlier on whenever she made more negative commentary about Obama. And, recently her tone about Palin has alluded to a more favorable slant too. » Posted By Wiseronenow On February 8, 2011 @ 12:27 am Additionally: the posts that are popping up are HEAVILY supporting he decision and that they are not going anywhere. Suckers. » Posted By Wiseronenow On February 7, 2011 @ 5:12 pm Update: on the lead HP article on her defection there are only 16 pending comments!!! It revolution has begun!!! Yea!!! » Posted By Wiseronenow On February 7, 2011 @ 5:08 pm Fantastic! And, no, I won’t use the F&F or Faved!. Just FRIGGEN FANTASTIC!! » Posted By Wiseronenow On February 7, 2011 @ 5:05 pm I wouldn’t be surprised if HP offers some sort of incentive to have folks not jump ship and/or stay on. Maybe, in the form of some sort of contest. You better believe she is monitoring the number that have abandoned that site since her announcement. » Posted By Wiseronenow On February 7, 2011 @ 5:01 pm I agree, the continual propping up of Palin, but I had felt for some time whenever Arianna wrote about Palin it started to lean more favorably. Maybe, it was just me. I also became disgusted at her continual negativity towards Obama. It was very obvious. » Posted By Wiseronenow On February 7, 2011 @ 4:51 pm And, I found out if one posts in the wee-hours of the morning at HP it made it because there must have been a skeleton mod crew working. » Posted By Wiseronenow On February 7, 2011 @ 4:35 pm Hi-Hi! This is such a breath of fresh air!! » Posted By Wiseronenow On February 7, 2011 @ 4:10 pm BTW: I had posted this site right after her news this morning, but I had to mask it to get it posted, but it made it. The words: planetpov is HEAVILY moderated on HP. Meaning, she has been well aware of this site for a long time, especially when planetpov posted the article with her meeting up with Issa, real chummy they were. Search it out. Another eye opener. » Posted By Wiseronenow On February 7, 2011 @ 4:08 pm Hi, ‘y all! Formerly, “Muzzle Me” @ HuffPo. Found this site when I read about Arianna’s meet up with Issa a few weeks back in Vegas. At which point, actually earlier than that, I had begun to realize all is not what it seems over at Corportington. And, she conveniently had forgot to mention when giving the history start up of HP, that BrietBARF also helped her launch it. She also, during Clinton’s woes, had established one of the first websites to impeach Clinton. And, let’s not forget she also was a Repub for many years before realizing she could make more $$’s merely acting progressive. » Posted By Wiseronenow On February 7, 2011 @ 4:04 pm Good morning, Redemption and warmer hugs and smiles your way too. I, too, didn’t realize how much time I spent (just me) yammering on and on about such superficial stuff and as evidenced in what got me so upset this morning. Which is the interesting phenomenon of the HP site, isn’t it? They tapped into that type of political angst that has been out there and for some time. Then the tea party came along and it was a further boon for their site. Less than more of civil discourse doesn’t pay the bills, eh? So, in that regard, I can see why she has been able to corner that internet market better than others. Hence, the reason why AOL even gave her a passing glance. Yet, it was beyond disengenous that she is now claiming that her site has NEVER been political solely. That is what really got to me. Have a wonderful day. I’m off to not just having a great day, but making it one. :o) » Posted By Wiseronenow On February 12, 2011 @ 4:04 am Good morning all. Well, couldn’t sleep and thought I’d check in on varioius sites to see how the world has changed since I last ventured there. Well, but no surprise something that really got my juices flowing: Arianna Huffington on Bill Maher’s show yesterday. She is now claiming that her site is NOT political and never was!! Seriously? Then the question bears asking: WHY!!! has she ONLY been on “political” talk shows? I never heard her venture onto those shows and talk about fashion, entertainment and the like which she is now claiming is the actual makeup of her site. But, no surprise that Bill wanted to continue with his sucking up to actually ANYONE that he would give her a forum to counter any negative comments about her AOL buyout. But, then Bill goes on to ask HER a POLITICAL QUESTION and about Obama. Unbelievable. And, OF COURSE, she said nothing positive about Obama. She should have said: “no, no Bill ask me a question about what Suri Cruise’s spring fashion line might be”. The woman is a total hypocrite. » Posted By Wiseronenow On February 12, 2011 @ 1:55 am And, I thought Palin said/wanted family members off limits? Oh, that’s right, it’s Palin. Never mind. » Posted By Wiseronenow On February 11, 2011 @ 3:42 am I had it done apx. 6 years ago or so. The procedure went very smoothly and no real complications following. The couple incisions for the type of procedure your wife will have causes very little after effects too. However, (there is always one, eh?), I found that I did have to change my diet. No fried foods, processed foods and the like. My system can’t seem to break down those type of foods. Added benefit for me from the surgery: don’t really gain any additional weight. Yet, I never was overweight at any time. But, I can assure you the pain prior, had a couple runs to the ER. That went on for about a year and then was rushed to hospital ending with the surgery. Your wife will be fine, really. Wish her the best! » Posted By Wiseronenow On February 10, 2011 @ 8:23 pmComments Posted By Wiseronenow
«« Back To Stats Page
Home Stats