Stats

Comments Posted By SallyT

Displaying 2,341 To 2,370 Of 4,640 Comments

Time Out for O/T – Vol. 18

Oh, they would pay me $250 not to shop naked!

Supermarket Offers $250 Of Free Food To Anyone Who Shops Naked (see video in article)

Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/german-supermarket-offers-shopping-spree-with-a-catch-you-have-to-be-naked-2012-6#ixzz1yfkyp7zU

I love how it is mostly men shopping and the isles they are hitting the most are the liquor and beer isles. PARTY!!

» Posted By SallyT On June 23, 2012 @ 7:09 pm

See article for the charts but basically it is this:
Corporate Profits Just Hit An All-Time High, Wages Just Hit An All-Time Low

1) Corporate profit margins just hit an all-time high. Companies are making more per dollar of sales than they ever have before. (And some people are still saying that companies are suffering from “too much regulation” and “too many taxes.” Maybe little companies are, but big ones certainly aren’t).

2) Fewer Americans are working than at any time in the past three decades. One reason corporations are so profitable is that they don’t employ as many Americans as they used to.

3) Wages as a percent of the economy are at an all-time low. This is both cause and effect. One reason companies are so profitable is that they’re paying employees less than they ever have as a share of GDP. And that, in turn, is one reason the economy is so weak: Those “wages” are other companies’ revenue.

In short, our current system and philosophy is creating a country of a few million overlords and 300+ million serfs.

Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/corporate-profits-just-hit-an-all-time-high-wages-just-hit-an-all-time-low-2012-6#ixzz1yfjkR3sl

» Posted By SallyT On June 23, 2012 @ 7:03 pm

Jerry Sandusky found guilty of child sex abuse, should spend rest of his life in prison

Jerry Sandusky was found guilty Friday night on 45 of 48 counts of child sexual molestation and faces up to 442 years in prison.

http://sports.yahoo.com/news/ncaaf–jerry-sandusky-guilty-child-sex-abuse-jury-judge-cleland.html

» Posted By SallyT On June 22, 2012 @ 7:30 pm

Verdict has been reached in the Jerry Sandusky Trial and should be disclosed shortly.

» Posted By SallyT On June 22, 2012 @ 6:41 pm

CL, I don’t have a Twitter account but I will get one just to tell them to “Knock if off! CL is not mean! I am, though, so get screwed!” I don’t care if they band me. Whomever did that to you is just jealous because you are smarter than them. You keep it up, CL, you are the best! 🙂

» Posted By SallyT On June 20, 2012 @ 4:52 pm

AdLib, who really cares? I think it was a movement that was captured and built on and you think it was created. Same results either way. I think it is organized and you think it is not. You say I am mistaken and I don’t see a mistake so much as a different opinion. There was a book review in the Oregonian called “The Ron Paul’s Revolution” that says “a political movement that fertilized Tea Party”. http://blog.oregonlive.com/myoregon/2012/06/ron_pauls_revolution_by_brian.html
Hell, I can’t stand TP! I don’t care where they came from but I sure wish there would go back or get lost!

» Posted By SallyT On June 15, 2012 @ 12:48 am

AdLib, you may think I am “mistaken” but it is my understanding that the Tea Party came out of the Ron Paul campaign. So, I looked it up and found the TeaParty started “from a Tax Day protests held throughout the 1990s and in 2001 some conservative activists were sending tea bags to legislators and other officials via postal mail as an act of symbolism. The anniversary of the original Boston Tea Party was commemorated on December 16, 2007, by Republican Congressman Ron Paul supporters who held a “Boston tea-party event” in 2007 which was a fundraiser for the Ron Paul 2008 Presidential Campaign which advocated an end to fiat money and the Federal Reserve System, disengaging from foreign entanglements in Iraq and Afghanistan, and upholding States’ rights.” “Fox News commentator Juan Williams says that the TPM emerged from the ashes of Paul’s 2008 presidential primary campaign.” And, this movement was captured and foster by the Koch brothers.

» Posted By SallyT On June 15, 2012 @ 12:12 am

I don’t think anyone is fooled that the Teabaggers movement was taken over by those you listed. Not even Maheur. He used them to make a point. But they are organized (regardless of who is behind them), they saw a movement and they captured it, and they did get a lot elected. If OWS was more organized and showing some structure, they would get money sources involved, too. Maybe they wouldn’t want them but they do need them, especially the Unions. They would make a good match and the Unions know how to organize and how to push a cause.

» Posted By SallyT On June 14, 2012 @ 10:41 pm

Murph, there are days when I just want to scream thinking that people might be so stupid to allow us to go backwards. Like today, all I saw was everyone criticizing the President’s speech for saying the same think thing, being too long, and not talking more about all he has done. (I think he should talk more about the good he has done and that the Repugs have not allowed him to do anything else) But, no one was criticizing Romney’s and he didn’t say anything at all of substance! And, hell, why don’t those people saying the Prez should talk more about all he had done not doing that themselves? Because they want there to be a close election because that is more exciting to report. It is still early but it isn’t too early to try and talk some sense into people. However, there are a lot that are a lost cause. You are right to be concern about the stupidity of the American Voter. I don’t think much will happen in the next couple of months, its summer after all and people are to wrapped up in vacations and enjoying the weather.
I hope you are wrong, Murph, because I ain’t ready to move out of the country just yet!

» Posted By SallyT On June 14, 2012 @ 10:26 pm

They wouldn’t let her speak today at all. I guess they were afraid she might say penis or better yet, call them all pricks!

» Posted By SallyT On June 14, 2012 @ 10:09 pm

AdLib, I know this will sound bad but it might be good if the Repugs allowed the interest rates to go up on those school loans. That would get them out on the streets again. However, they are still out there. They were at the senate hearing with the Ahole from JP Morgan. It didn’t get a lot of press but they did give him a good shouting before they got kicked out. Now don’t you bite my head off but Bill Maheur did make a good point last week that OWS needs to get organized, not just campout, but get more involved in the politics of the issues. Clean themselves up and look presentable. Get some people to run for office and hold some of the Dems feet to the fire like the TeaBaggers do. I know this much, our OWS guys will be smarter from the get go than any TeaBagger! I know we will see OWS out in number again.

» Posted By SallyT On June 14, 2012 @ 10:05 pm

Yes, AdLib that is so true but sometimes we need to hear the lies just so we are prepared to counter because there are people that might believe him. We will have more counters than Ikea’s kitchen section when we’re thru, tho! 😉

I thought you might like how he ended his article:
“He’s a liar, a bully, and has an infatuation with authoritarian behavior.”

» Posted By SallyT On June 14, 2012 @ 9:50 pm

Dana Loesch Gets Tongue-Lashing At Netroots Nation 2012

Acting as the appointed Brietbart concern troll, CNN’s Dana Loesch……
innocently inquire as to why it is that union dues and membership dropped ahead of the recall. In Loesch’s world, those evil unions were punished by working people for spending their money on “Democrat candidates.”

Harry Weisbren sums it up this way:

Two main points emerged during the discussion: that the power of Wall Street and the 1% to subvert our democracy by buying elections is getting exponentially worse, and that the Democratic party failed to understand the broader occupation-inspired movement growing in response to this dynamic.

WEISBREN: I think the ability of the 1 percent billionaires to spread political propaganda – to have expensive television commercials – is an unparalleled power that we’ve never seen before. It is able to manipulate people to vote against their own interests and it’s a specific plan to subvert democracy by making democratic discourse something you can literally buy.

This attitude that money is speech, that corporations can take over the voices of working families and drown them out is something that is shameful and I think the attitude that union dues are the same as checks from Wall Street is pathetic, frankly.

http://crooksandliars.com/karoli/dana-loesch-gets-tongue-lashing-netroots-na

» Posted By SallyT On June 14, 2012 @ 9:07 pm

Romney’s New Lie About The Affordable Care Act

This local interview in Iowa has apparently given Mitt Romney yet another lie to spew at his victims. This one goes something like this: President Obama is out of touch with small business needs and doesn’t even understand how Obamacare is hurting them. Why look! Here’s a small business that had to close one of its locations because Obamacare caused them to!

It turns out that the company didn’t close because of Obamacare at all, according to a company spokesperson. What’s more, the company sees lack of demand as the key problem — a lack of demand that is partly due to the drive to repeal or modify Obamacare, not to the implementation of the law itself.

Schurman said that lack of demand for the product was a leading culprit. He pointed to a variety of factors that are inducing companies that buy Nemschoff’s health care furniture to hold off, including general economic conditions, the continuing bad news from Europe, and — yes — the drive to repeal or change Obamacare in Congress and the Supreme Court.

“The ongoing uncertainty surrounding what health care reform will take place has caused some health care provider customers and other related aspects of the industry to defer investments in their facilities,” Schurman said.

“The issue is not the administration’s propsed reforms,” he continued. “The issue is that there is no certainty as to what reform is going to look like. Is it going to be repealed or modified? Is it going to be decided in June by the Supreme Court, or the election? Or decided through a series of lawsuits?”

“The uncertainty is caused by the ongoing debate,” Schurman said. “Were there no ongoing debate, there would be no uncertainty.”

(Romney) he’s determined to lie about it in order to get to his desired political end, because Romney knows that he can lie about it and once the lie hits ears willing to hear, it doesn’t really matter what the truth is.

Except for this: Romney is a liar. He’s a liar, a bully, and has an infatuation with authoritarian behavior. That’s a truth he won’t be able to escape.

http://crooksandliars.com/karoli/romneys-new-lie-about-obamacare

» Posted By SallyT On June 14, 2012 @ 6:32 pm

Wharton Professor: Employers Want Top Skills At Low Wages and That’s Why You Don’t Have A Job

“Finally someone speaks the truth about U.S. employers claiming they just can’t find people for job openings. Wharton Business School Professor Peter Cappelli has analyzed why employers dare to claim they cannot find people to hire when the United States has over 27 million people needing a job.

There is no skills shortage, none. In fact employers are being absolutely ridiculous in their hiring practices. It’s so bad, employers use software and third party rejection job application websites, which pretty much guarantee a candidate will be rejected. These websites and software are like virtual wastebaskets for your resume. No human involved, it’s automatic, guaranteed rejection. It’s so bad, an HR executive applied for his own job and was rejected.”

http://crooksandliars.com/susie-madrak/wharton-professor-employers-want-top-

» Posted By SallyT On June 14, 2012 @ 6:18 pm

Well, at least he didn’t leave his child there or breakup the furniture and throw away the tablecloths! And, where the hell was his aids????

OOPS! Obama Accidentally Dines And Dashes On Two Servicemen
White House Forgets to Pay Father’s Day Lunch Tab

As the group chatted about fatherhood, the president enjoyed a steaming plate of pork ribs with hot sauce, collard greens, red beans and rice and cornbread.
The bill for the president and his four guests was $55.58, but was left unpaid at the point of sale, according to pool reports.
The White House corrected the oversight and settled up the tab by the end of the business day.

http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/06/white-house-forgets-to-pay-fathers-day-lunch-tab/

» Posted By SallyT On June 14, 2012 @ 6:07 pm

Maybe they would have felt better if she had said va-jj….

Lawmaker barred from speaking over ‘vagina’ comment

“Lansing – House Republicans prohibited state Rep. Lisa Brown from speaking on the floor Thursday after she ended a speech Wednesday against a bill restricting abortions by referencing her female anatomy.

Brown, a West Bloomfield Democrat and mother of three, said a package of abortion regulation bills would violate her Jewish religious beliefs that pregnancy be aborted to save the life of the mother.

“Finally, Mr. Speaker, I’m flattered that you’re all so interested in my vagina, but ‘no’ means ‘no,'” Brown said Wednesday.

“What she said was offensive,” said Rep. Mike Callton, R-Nashville. “It was so offensive, I don’t even want to say it in front of women. I would not say that in mixed company.” (Oh give me a break! I bet he calls it pussy.)

“If I can’t say the word vagina, why are we legislating vaginas?” Brown asked Thursday at a hastily called Capitol press conference. “What language should I use?”

House Republicans also wouldn’t let state Rep. Barb Byrum speak on the House floor today.

Byrum, D-Onondaga, caused a disturbance on the House floor Wednesday when she wasn’t allowed to introduce an amendment to the abortion regulations bill banning men from getting a vasectomy unless the sterilization procedure was necessary to save a man’s life.

“If we truly want to make sure children are born, we would regulate vasectomies,” Byrum told reporters Thursday.

From The Detroit News: http://www.detroitnews.com/article/20120614/POLITICS02/206140467#ixzz1xopdTQDs

» Posted By SallyT On June 14, 2012 @ 5:54 pm

Oregon is not reducing property taxes. They are going after them hot and heavy. State needs the money. Also, several election past, we voted (when property values were going sky high)that the state could not raise our property taxes more than 3% each year. Well, no one figured that the housing prices would go down, way down. Believe me, I have tried to get mine reduced but no cigar. We are stuck with that law and everyone is pissed now but we did it to ourselves because apparently didn’t understand it. Hopefully, we can get that changed.

» Posted By SallyT On June 14, 2012 @ 2:49 pm

Bito, his testimony is on live now at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-18438956
in case you wanted to watch some of it.

» Posted By SallyT On June 14, 2012 @ 2:22 am

Well, that is interesting, Bito. Explains some of the attitudes in Florida. And, Vermont, gee, why does it have to be so cold there. Oregon property taxes probably helped in evening the score here. (We don’t have a sales tax and we don’t tax SS. But, we tax the hell out of property!)

» Posted By SallyT On June 14, 2012 @ 2:11 am

LOL XOXO David! Duck David cause SHTF today!

» Posted By SallyT On June 14, 2012 @ 1:57 am

AdLib, I found this in an article written at the time of American’s filing bankruptcy. Explains some of the trouble with the unions. As always, management got theirs first!

Bonus backlash

In 2003, American avoided bankruptcy by winning $1.6 billion in concessions from its major labor groups. Pilots, flight attendants, mechanics and ground crew workers all took pay cuts of 15 to 33 percent.

The company also initiated a cost-savings program, Pull Together — Win Together, that brought managers and employees together to develop strategies to save money and boost revenue.

But four years later, when nearly 900 managers received stock bonuses valued at $160 million, union workers were furious. Arpey defended the bonus plan, which dated to the 1990s, as essential for retaining top employees.

“Because so much of senior management’s compensation is based on stock, when the company does poorly, they don’t get paid” as much, he told analysts in April 2007, acknowledging that employees weren’t satisfied with the explanation. “I understand this is a subject where we disagree with the unions, and many employees have concerns about this issue.”

Although American restructured its executive bonus plans, the feelings of good will fostered between management and rank-and-file employees were gone.

“In any business you have to have trust between management and labor, and you have to have a sense of shared objectives and shared gain,” Harteveldt said. “It’s really hard for employees who were asked and did give up a lot in terms of wages and benefits to then see executives obtain a lot of money.”

Arpey’s management style, which was more subdued than that of predecessors Don Carty and Bob Crandall, also hurt employee morale. Analysts say he was rarely seen outside of the company’s headquarters, on Amon Carter Boulevard.

“They didn’t know who they were working for. They didn’t know what they were working for,” Boyd said. “That was a mistake Arpey made.”

Read more here: http://www.star-telegram.com/2011/12/16/3601197/american-airlines-bankruptcy.html#storylink=cpy

» Posted By SallyT On June 14, 2012 @ 1:17 am

If the unions still had the power they once had (before Reagan)there certainly wouldn’t be a 300% higher CEO pay in comparison to the average worker! Union negotiate for wage increase for the employees based on company profits and they hold wages down if the company is in trouble. And, I can’t stand it when all these Repugs are attacking the union pension plans because unions still have pension plans not 401K’s that Wall Street destroyed gains. (My husband can’t be part of his company 401k plan because he is in the union. The 401k plan has company stock and the company doesn’t want the union having any of the stock. But, that is good because the management people are complaining because they lost so much of their 401ks when the market crashed. His pension is still fine.) The Repugs want to turn people against the unions because they don’t have pensions and they lost so much of their 401ks. Well, folks, that wasn’t the unions fault!

» Posted By SallyT On June 14, 2012 @ 12:48 am

Bito, they may keep them insured but they will rise the premiums with each year they are on until you can’t afford to have them on.

» Posted By SallyT On June 14, 2012 @ 12:23 am

Bito, I was part of a discussion on another site where someone was arguing that there is no need for unions anymore because laws have been passed to protect employees now. Well, if there weren’t unions those laws never would have been presented and if there are no unions, you can kiss those laws good bye because no one will be there to protect them and fight to keep them enforced.

» Posted By SallyT On June 14, 2012 @ 12:10 am

Dakota Decides: Voters Reject Misguided Religion Amendment

“North Dakota is the kind of state that often doesn’t get a lot of attention. But yesterday, voters there did something great, and they should take a minute to pat themselves on the back. The rest of America should thank them, too.”

“This amendment wasn’t really about religious freedom. In fact, it was a power grab by influential religious special interests in the state. The so-called “Religious Liberty Restoration Act” (Amendment 3), was engineered by the state’s Catholic hierarchy and its Religious Right allies.

These clerical special interests claimed that the constitutional change was necessary to strengthen religious liberty rights that were allegedly being placed in jeopardy. In fact, the amendment would have gone way beyond that. It would have endangered the rights of citizens of the state in various ways, possible curtailing access to vital health services, shooting down the rights of LGBT resident and infringing on the rights of all North Dakota taxpayers by compelling the state to give public support to religious groups.”

“North Dakota voters decided not to take the risk. They didn’t just defeat Amendment 3, they trounced it. The vote was 64 percent against to 36 percent for.”

“It was a nice win, but there’s more work to be done. A similarly dangerous ballot amendment on “religious freedom” is pending in Missouri in August, and Florida faces a sweeping attempt to water down its church-state provisions in November.”

“P.S. The scope of groups that opposed this measure was truly impressive, and AU was proud to work alongside them. They included the North Dakota Women’s Network, Prevent Child Abuse North Dakota, the National Association of Social Workers North Dakota Chapter, the North Dakota Western Synod of the Evangelical Lutheran Churches of America and others. See more here.”

http://www.talk2action.org/story/2012/6/13/11927/4474/Front_Page/Dakota_Decides_Voters_Reject_Misguided_Religion_Amendment

» Posted By SallyT On June 13, 2012 @ 9:47 pm

Yep, and Fred and Wilma Flintstones were their grandchildren, Bito. I can see it……makes as must sense as the bible thumpers angle. 😉
I’m with you, Bito, in not understanding everything about the Black Holes but I do find the programs on the Science Channels fascinating!

» Posted By SallyT On June 13, 2012 @ 9:26 pm

http://www.truthdig.com/cartoon/item/joint_session_20120613/

[img]http://www.truthdig.com/images/eartothegrounduploads/lk061412dAPR-500.jpg[/img]

» Posted By SallyT On June 13, 2012 @ 9:14 pm

BIG OIL AT IT’S FINEST! The New Dallas starts tonight on TNT. IT is about the next generation, the children of J.R. and Bobby Ewing. But, J.R. (Larry Hagman), Bobby (Patrick Duffy) and Sue Ellen (Linda Gray) are back, too. Oh nostalgia! 🙂

http://www.tntdrama.com/series/dallas/

» Posted By SallyT On June 13, 2012 @ 9:09 pm

Seniors Could Lose Prescription Drug Discounts If Supreme Court Strikes Down Obamacare

“Nearly one in four seniors “reported skipping doses, cutting pills in half or not filling a prescription, simply due to cost,” before health reform became law. And now, if the Supreme Court rules against the measure, it could put their drug discounts in danger.
At the same time, Medicare participants’ loss would be pharmaceutical companies’ gain because they would not have to shell out $80 billion to help fix the prescription coverage doughnut hole. One CEO estimated that closing the gap would cost his company between $20 million and $30 million in annual revenue. But without the Affordable Care Act, that would be $20 million to $30 million coming out of seniors’ pockets instead.”

http://thinkprogress.org/health/2012/06/13/498879/seniors-could-lose-prescription-drug-discounts-if-supreme-court-strikes-down-obamacare/

» Posted By SallyT On June 13, 2012 @ 8:59 pm

«« Back To Stats Page