Displaying 0 To 0 Of 0 Comments ADONAI I am sure that would reduce the unemployed to around 6%. What could be better? » Posted By KB723 On March 2, 2011 @ 6:25 pm PW That sounds Toooo Old School. How bout’ Cactus Socks??? » Posted By KB723 On March 2, 2011 @ 6:24 pm ADONAI I think it would be more Fun to Fart in the Face of whomever is in the stocks.. Imagine, a pic can be taken and put on a T-Shirt or Mousepad. Talk about creating JOBS!!!!! » Posted By KB723 On March 2, 2011 @ 6:20 pm PW Thanks for helping me out. Would that be the equivilant of Asbestos or FiberGlass underwear??? » Posted By KB723 On March 2, 2011 @ 6:17 pm ADONAI. I could think anything… But still don’t know what that is… ๐ » Posted By KB723 On March 2, 2011 @ 6:13 pm ADONAI an funksands, What the heck is a HairShirt?? » Posted By KB723 On March 2, 2011 @ 6:07 pm Ummmm “Pinkos” I am staying out of this one…. » Posted By KB723 On March 2, 2011 @ 5:59 pm ADONAI I Agree and have a Very long list of applicants. Pre-Approved Mind You… ๐ » Posted By KB723 On March 2, 2011 @ 5:51 pm ADONAI. Really??? What kind of Humiliation??? I am watering at the mouth!!!! » Posted By KB723 On March 2, 2011 @ 5:44 pm Sabreen60, I just saw that myself. I am sure it’s NOT legal. Just another rethuglican Ploy. Unless it worked! Than I would be very angry…. » Posted By KB723 On March 2, 2011 @ 5:42 pm PlumpinChubby, What does Scholling mean? » Posted By KB723 On March 2, 2011 @ 5:27 pm Cher, I am sorry to have missed that. I am sure there will be little to talk about.. » Posted By KB723 On March 2, 2011 @ 5:09 pm “Here’s some news.” Clarence Thomas Faces Call For His Disbarment Wednesday, March 2, 2011 U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas should be disbarred for his failure to truthfully complete financial-disclosure forms over a 20-year period, according to a complaint filed by the watchdog group Protect Our Elections (POE). In a bar complaint filed with the Missouri Supreme Court, POE attorney Kevin Zeese says Thomas committed multiple violations of the Missouri Rules of Professional Conduct. (See full complaint below.) Zeese asks the Office of Chief Disciplinary Counsel to take immediate action against Thomas, including disbarment. ……………….. POE makes a compelling argument that Clarence Thomas has no business sitting on the U.S. Supreme Court: ***** A lawyer who commits a crime is subject to disbarment. A lawyer who fails to disclose important financial information as require by law is subject to disbarment. A lawyer who makes rulings on cases that will benefit himself and his wife is subject to disbarment. A Judge who commits 20 crimes by falsifying 20 disclosure forms in order to enrich himself and his family, as did Justice Thomas, is subject to disbarment. A lawyer who withholds information about a supporter when ruling on a case involving that support is subject to disbarment. *****Justice Thomas violated the Rules of Professional Conduct: he committed crimes that carry serious jail time if prosecuted, he acted in a untrustworthy manner, his conduct involved dishonesty, deceit and misrepresentation, and he engaged in conduct that seriously interfered with the administration of justice. Therefore, he must be disciplined. Below is the full bar complaint against Clarence Thomas: Read more: http://legalschnauzer.blogspot.com/2011/03/clarence-tho… » Posted By KB723 On March 2, 2011 @ 4:59 pm jkkFl, Oh, Ok…. I learned something New Today, Thanks for Sharing. ๐ » Posted By KB723 On March 1, 2011 @ 8:42 pm Charlie Sheen has got It goin’ on!!! » Posted By KB723 On March 1, 2011 @ 8:30 pm jkkFL. That’s news I would have never known about. Hard to believe. What Is a Pauper? Is that like the Pied Piper? » Posted By KB723 On March 1, 2011 @ 8:28 pm jkkFL. I guess the positive here is that they are Not hiding in the Shaddows? Always nice to know where to find the TroubleMakers. Maybe we can hire WackenHut to keep an eye on them??? » Posted By KB723 On March 1, 2011 @ 8:10 pm KQuark, I sometimes think that neither Party is greatly concerned with any of the American folks that elected them. I think there is something more going on than you or I know. Perhaps a Paranoia From vids like this? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iTc1Rw1WkFc They seem to forget that a full wheelbarrow of money cannot buy » Posted By KB723 On March 1, 2011 @ 7:51 pm KQuark I think he had a late night. Big Ed is Breakin’ it Down!!! ๐ » Posted By KB723 On March 1, 2011 @ 7:36 pm Truth, Great reply. I can agree with all that you say. ๐ » Posted By KB723 On March 1, 2011 @ 7:08 pm Truth, I am not sure they will see a penny. I am sure somewhere in the paperwork there must be a loophole. I guess we just wait and see. I do have High hopes that they will be justified. » Posted By KB723 On March 1, 2011 @ 6:54 pm KT That was Cute, Thanks for sharing, kinda took me back a minute… Reminded me of GW shredding the constitution. ๐ » Posted By KB723 On March 1, 2011 @ 6:40 pm Arianna Huffington urged to end โexploitationโ of journalists By Eric W. Dolan The Newspaper Guild, a journalists’ union with more than 34,000 members, has launched a letter writing campaign calling on Arianna Huffington, the co-founder of the Huffington Post, to share her fortune with the unpaid writers who made her successful. “As we look to the future, we look to you, Arianna Huffington, as a leader in web-based news coverage, to demonstrate your commitment to the value of journalism, and to help prevent independent journalists from having to settle for third-world wages,” the letter to Ms. Huffington stated. Writers for ArtScene and Visual Art Source also announced Monday that they were going on strike against the Huffington Post until the publication proposed a pay schedule and stopped placing promotional material alongside editorial content. “It is unethical to expect trained and qualified professionals to contribute quality content for nothing,” Bill Lasarow, publisher and co-editor of Visual Art Source, said in a statement. “It is unethical to cannibalize the investment of other organizations who bear the cost of compensation and other overhead without payment for the usage of their content. It is extremely unethical to not merely blur but eradicate the distinction between the independent and informed voice of news and opinion and the voice of a shill.” Mario Ruiz, the Senior Vice President of Media Relations at the Huffington Post, defended the online publication in a letter to Guild president Bernie Lunzer, noting that the Huffington Post employs 143 editors, writers, and reporters. “While we pay our editors and reporters, we donโt pay for the opinion pieces submitted by our thousands of bloggers,” Ruiz explained. “The vast majority of our bloggers understand the value of having a platform that reaches a very large audience. People blog on HuffPost for free for the same reason they go on cable TV shows every night for free โ because they are passionate about their ideas, want them to be heard by the largest possible audience, and understand the value that that kind of visibility can bring.” “Our bloggers can choose to write for HuffPost โ or not write for HuffPost,” he continued. “They can write as often as like they like or as little as they like. Itโs both wrong and offensive to insist that HuffPost is exploiting journalists.” In response, Lunzer said he had “great concerns about the HuffPost model and its long-term effect on journalism.” The Huffington Post has faced a slew criticism from liberals and progressives after it was sold to AOL for $315 million. “Any business owner who uses largely unpaid labor, with a handful of underpaid, nonunion employees, to build a company that is sold for a few hundred million dollars, no matter how he or she is introduced to you on the television screen, is not a liberal or a progressive,” American journalist, author and war correspondent Chris Hedges wrote at TruthDig last week. “If Huffington has a conscience, she will sit down when the AOL check arrives and make sure every cent of it is paid out to those who worked free or at minimal wages for her over the last six years.” “My Take: Ha good luck suckers” » Posted By KB723 On March 1, 2011 @ 6:34 pm Out of here Like BadWind… HA!!!! Catch me if you Can. » Posted By KB723 On February 28, 2011 @ 9:43 pm ADONAI Good Night and Best Wishes…. ๐ » Posted By KB723 On February 28, 2011 @ 9:30 pm “FartThief????” » Posted By KB723 On February 28, 2011 @ 9:28 pm funk. Maybe voting is Not always a good idea? No matter Who is the lesser of two Evils???? ๐ฟ » Posted By KB723 On February 28, 2011 @ 9:19 pm chazmania, Glad to Welcome you to the Planet. ๐ » Posted By KB723 On February 28, 2011 @ 8:56 pm chase. Thanks for yet another laugh… Just pudding and beer this time LOL!!!! » Posted By KB723 On February 28, 2011 @ 8:54 pm KQ, Somebody was walking around in a night robe, with pockets, Mind You…. Talking about his/her cats breath. You heard anything about that???? » Posted By KB723 On February 28, 2011 @ 8:50 pmComments Posted By KB723
Edited on Wed Mar-02-11 03:28 PM by kpete
Source: Legal Schnauzer
CoCo Puffs in Heaven. ๐
Monday, February 28
Good Night Folks. No Crime… No Foul!!!!! 
«« Back To Stats Page
Home Stats