• Facebook
  • Twitter
bito On July - 14 - 2012
Fooled Yet?

Fooled Yet?

The news on the prospective Republican presidential nominee this week has been fast and furious and has nothing to do with a Darrell Issa bogus investigation even though it does seem contemptible.  Dribs and Drabs it isn’t, a new story, angle, article or accusation seems to be popping up almost hourly about Mitt and his financial entanglements.

Thus and therefore, Ipso Facto, and whereas we need a spot to put “da stuff” and here it is!  A mini TO/OT, if you will, dedicated to Willard’s walk on the financial wild side.  PlanetPOV’s very own collection of opposition research collected from your comments.

To follow our policy though, you may disagree with the Democrats and think they have gone to far, that it’s unfounded or that “Bainers” are no better than “Birthers” and it is clouding the policy debates that this country is badly needs.

This is the place to express it.

My take that I think many, no most, are either missing, avoiding or ignoring is not just the Bain story and when Mitt was or wasn’t running Bain, but his foreign accounts, investments  and investment companies.  So little is even know about them and so little can even be discovered about them, that’s why they exist, they are there to be hidden, to be secretive.  Offshore accounts now may hold as much as 17 TRILLION dollars of unregulated, unreported and secretive accounts and how much of that is Mitt Romney’s?  No one knows nor does any regulator know what it is investing in.  Who are the invstors?

Are his accounts invested in gun or dope running?  Laundering those enterprises money?  Are they invested in dictatorships, are the dictators investing in them.  Paramilitary groups, are they getting a good or poor return investing in the accounts?  How much is Mitt Inc. making? We don’t know.

OK, I did pick some very nasty and nefarious people and activities, but if Mitt chooses to not disclose, can’t I make the worst of assumptions?  Paul Krugman stuck that note the other day, we can only assume.

It can neither be slanderous nor scandalous, I am not making any accusations, I can’t, because I don’t know — Only Mitt knows and he’s not talking.

The very secretiveness of these accounts would seem to make him unelectable to me.  And don’t fall for what he said in his Friday night dump that these accounts are controlled by his “blind trust,” they were set up well before he had any such thing, another lie.

Now ask yourself this: Without knowing what the accounts are invested in, who the investors are, how much they are worth or how much the other investors have invested.  How would they effect his presidential decisions?  Would he make a decision not based on information from his Secretary of  State, Secretary of Commerce or the Secretary of Defense but from knowing that it would harm one of his investors even if that person was violating human rights?

Along with his unseen tax returns, this is just way too secretive for me.  The American people deserve better from “the leader of the free world.”  We deserve to be an informed voter.

After all, “he is running for President of the United States, for Pete’s sake.”

Categories: News & Politics

Written by bito

Was once a handsome frog until kissed by an ugly corporate princess.----- Like a well honed knife, the internet can be a wonderful and useful tool. It can be used to prepare and serve a delicious meal or it can be used to cause harm. peace

83 Responses so far.

Click here to leave a comment
  1. bito says:

    Why am I not shocked at this, there is hardly a scrap of paper that the American voter can look at that hasn’t been destroyed, personal proprietary or hidden.

    2002 Olympic papers unlikely to shed light on Romney’s leadership
    Operational details of Salt Lake 2002 Games will not be included

    People searching for insight on how Salt Lake’s 2002 Winter Games operated and how Mitt Romney led the effort may be disappointed when 1,100 boxes of Olympic archives are made public next month, according to the project director.

    “I think they will have no answers,” said Elizabeth Rogers, curator of manuscripts at the University of Utah Marriott Library.

    The records that the Salt Lake Olympic Committee turned over to the University of Utah do not appear to contain things like meaningful budget documents, internal memos, executive calendars and other records that might shed light on the internal workings of the Olympic organization, Rogers said.


    As large as the project is, operational details of the Games will not be included. The Olympic Committee set its own policy on which records should be kept and which should be destroyed

    And of course the alibi:

    Romney — who had previously been criticized for failing to preserve records from his term as governor of Massachusetts — was gone from the Olympic Committee before decisions were made on what documents to keep and played no role in the decision-making, according to the Romney campaign.

    Mark Jensen, who was hired as the SLOC archivist, said that personnel in each department had the discretion to decide what should be archived. Retention was voluntary, he said.

    And this is handy:

    “Anything we could disclose, of course, we couldn’t destroy that. Anything that had a legal or contractual requirement to be confidential … they were just destroyed,” Fraser Bullock, a longtime friend and business partner of Romney, who took the SLOC helm after Romney left, told ABC News, which reported on the status of the SLOC records Monday.

    Bullock told ABC that he doubts Romney saved personal papers or calendars.

    Much more>>> http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/politics/54542587-90/romney-olympic-information-records.html.csp

    Mitt takes the Nixon “Trust Me” with his secret ending of the Vietnam war to a whole ‘nother dimension.

  2. SallyT says:

    I heard on Lawrence ODonnell tonight talking about Romney and his flip flop on abortion and his meeting with the church when he was running for Governor of Mass. So, I found this article on it and that meeting.

    The Conversion
    How, when, and why Mitt Romney changed his mind on abortion.

    Wirthlin’s poll said that if he ran as a pro-lifer, he’d lose. It would be simplistic to say that the poll dictated Romney’s decision. But we know that he used the poll to influence the most important pro-life organization he had to appease at the time: the elders of the LDS church.

    In 1993, Romney went to Salt Lake City to explain to the Mormon church leaders why he was going to take a pro-choice position on abortion.
    Michael Madsen/Thinkstock.
    Scott’s account, as told in his book and in a more detailed interview with Slate, is based on conversations with Romney and other senior church officials who were present. As president of the Boston stake, Romney owed church leaders a consultation before doing anything that might cause them trouble. In October or November 1993, he went to Salt Lake City to meet with them and explain the abortion position he was going to take. Wirthlin went with him. In these meetings, Wirthlin was more than a pollster. He was a church official, a brother of one of the church’s 12 apostles, and a cousin of the church’s next president.
    Romney didn’t ask the brethren in Salt Lake what his abortion position should be. He had already decided on it. He didn’t ask them to endorse it, either. He came to explain his position, why he had to take it, and how it conformed to church doctrine. He told them he would say that he opposed abortion personally but that such private beliefs shouldn’t be imposed on others. Romney argued that this view was acceptable under the doctrine of free agency, and he used the poll data to close the sale. If he didn’t frame his position as pro-choice, he’d lose. Many of the church leaders were unhappy with Romney’s formulation. But if they wanted him in the Senate, this was the best they were going to get.
    Scott was present when Romney talked about the meetings after he returned to Boston.
    Judy Dushku, a Mormon feminist, says she heard a similar account from Romney in 1994:
    I went to his office and I congratulated him on taking a pro-choice position. And his response was—Well they told me in Salt Lake City I could take this position, and in fact I probably had to in order to win in a liberal state like Massachusetts. … I said, Mitt, it doesn’t make me happy to hear that. What you’re suggesting is that you’re not genuinely pro-choice. It’s a position of convenience. He said—Oh no, I actually had an aunt who died of a botched abortion. So I have some positive feelings about choice, but basically I know that I have to take that position.

    He even lied about the girl! She wasn’t an aunt but his sister husband’s sister! You cannot believe anything he says!


  3. SallyT says:

    So, Romney, when are you just going to say that the President copied from your many speeches?

    Romney To Olympians: ‘You Didn’t Get Here Solely On Your Own’

    Mitt Romney himself made an almost identical point during his speech at the Opening Ceremonies of the 2002 Winter Olympics, crediting the community for helping individuals achieve the pinnacle of success:
    ROMNEY: You Olympians, however, know you didn’t get here solely on your own power. For most of you, loving parents, sisters or brothers, encouraged your hopes, coaches guided, communities built venues in order to organize competitions. All Olympians stand on the shoulders of those who lifted them. We’ve already cheered the Olympians, let’s also cheer the parents, coaches, and communities.

    Visit NBCNews.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy


    • bito says:

      The other part of it Sally, is that his whole “success” at Bain was done using “Other People’s Money including the workers pension funds, tax loopholes, the local and state taxpayer breaks and grants.

      Anyone stealing a fifty year old working persons pension for the own enrichment is about as low as one can go in my book. Then he turns that loss over to the government so that the taxpayers can pick up the tab.

      • SallyT says:

        Bito, another thing is if you are a holding company (which Bain is) you can carry those tax losses from the company you put in bankruptcy over to another operating company you have for 10 years! A real savings on that company’s taxes. No matter what, they are making money on the horse that is already dead!

      • SallyT says:

        Yes, Bito, and they put the company in debt by borrowing against the company’s assets and take that money before filing bankruptcy on the company as their management fees.
        But the point of this article is that Romney is again saying just about the same thing as the President did when he said you didn’t build a company by yourself. Romney took that out of context and has it in an ad and trying to put the President down as not giving people any credit for building their business. Of course the President was saying that we all have help in one way or another. But Romeny is basically saying the same thing when he addressed the Olympics Openings. The Dems should use this in an ad back showing that this guy is a liar and a cheat.

  4. bito says:

    I’m not really sure which way to interpret this from Mitt.

    Carr says Romney quoted his ‘US in decline’ remark out of context

    FOREIGN minister Bob Carr says he wasn’t criticising America when he spoke of a nation “in decline” during a private conversation with Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney.

    Foreign Minister Bob Carr and other Australian officials said that Mr Carr was praising American economic strengths during Sunday’s meeting. The meeting was kept secret until Mr Romney shared Mr Carr’s comments with donors later in the day.

    “He said America is just one budget deal away from ending all talk of America being in decline,” Mr Romney said, while addressing roughly 250 donors at San Francisco’s Fairmont hotel. “I said, ‘Can I quote you on that?’ and he said, ‘Yes.'”

    Seizing on the remark to criticise a lack of leadership in Washington, Mr Romney added that Mr Carr “led the talk of America being in decline.”

    “See that’s not talk we hear about here as much as they’re hearing there. And if they’re thinking about investing in America, entrepreneurs putting their future in America, if they think America’s in decline, they’re not gonna do it,” Mr Romney said.


    “The foreign minister’s remarks represent a considered assessment of the US economy and an antidote to talk of US declinism,” said Kim Beazley, Australia’s ambassador to the United States.

    He said Mr Carr has identified increasing US energy competitiveness and continued inventiveness coming from Silicon Valley “as a sound base for the next progression in the US economy.”


    How many ways is this wrong? Why did Mitt take a private semi-diplomatic conversation and make it public for political purposes? How is it that he relayed the conversation 180 degrees from what the foreign minister meant, doesn’t he understand the Australian language? Is this what we can expect from him when he talks to foreign leaders? (I thought he said stand-up when what he said was shut-up?)

    I know this may seem minor, but it just so wrong and fits into all of Mitt’s lying so sickeningly perfect. It’s not how one does diplomacy.

  5. bito says:

    😆 VIDEO: I Didn’t Work At Bain

    I Didn’t Work At Bain (by Hockey Mama For Obama)

    H/T @GottaLaff http://thepoliticalcarnival.net/2012/07/22/video-i-didnt-work-at-bain/

  6. bito says:

    Romney Campaign: We Don’t Buy Twitter Followers

    That may be true, but something mighty weird is going on with the number of followers. An anomaly this large begs an explanation or it’s just another lie.

    See graph>>> http://www.buzzfeed.com/zekejmiller/romney-campaign-we-dont-buy-twitter-followers

  7. bito says:

    I would like this question asked to Mitt:

    You say you don’t believe that the recovery act worked at all nor does government spending help stimulate the economy even as a last resort, however you lobbied congress for 1.5 billion dollars for the Salt Lake Olympics, did that not stimulate the economy of the area and make huge private profits through public spending?

    Was that a proper role of the federal government, was that a good use of taxpayers money? Would you and the SLOG been as successful without the federal money? Would it and you have been as successful had you had the same amount of money as the Atlanta games (plus inflation) and not the very large amount you lobbied for the Salt lake Games?

    • This is just more Romney hypocrisy and mendacity. He said we need a stimulus back in 2008. Republicans keep on forgetting GWB did a stimulus in 2008 and two previous stimulus efforts. Then again if you are in the GOP that automatically makes you a hypocrite and liar now.

Leave your Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Back to top
PlanetPOV Tweets
Ongoing Stories